Abstract
Introduction: Treatment options for the young active patient with isolated symptomatic medial compartment OA and pre-existing ACL deficiency are limited. Implant longevity and activity levels may preclude TKA, whilst HTO and unicompartmentasl knee arythroplasty (UKA) are unreliable due to ligamentous instability. UKAs tend to fail because of wear or tibial loosening resulting from eccentric loading. Combined UKA and ACL reconstruction may therefore be a solution.
Method: Fifteen patients with combined ACL reconstruction and Oxford UKA (ACLR group), were matched (age, gender and follow-up period) with 15 patients with Oxford UKA with intact ACL (ACLI group). Prospectively collected clinical and x-ray data from the last follow-up (minimum 3 years, range: 3 – 5) were compared. Ten patients from each group also underwent in-vivo kinematic assessment using a standardised protocol.
Results: At the last follow-up, the clinical outcome for the two groups were similar. One ACLR patient needed revision due to infection. Radiological assessment did not show any significant difference between relative component positions and none of the patients had pathological radiolucencies suggestive of component loosening. Kinematic assessment showed posterior placement of the femur on tibia in extension for the ACLR group, which corrected with further flexion.
Conclusions: The short-term clinical results of combined ACL reconstruction and UKA are excellent. Lack of pathological radiolucencies and near normal knee kinematics suggest that early tibial loosening due to eccentric loading is unlikely.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr T Wilton, c/o BOA, BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.
