Abstract
There is little good evidence about the relative merits of different knee replacement designs as no adequately powered randomised controlled trials have been undertaken. To address this, a pragmatic multi-centre randomised trial involving 116 surgeons in 34 UK centres was begun in 1999. Within a partial factorial design 1715 patients were randomly allocated to patella resurfacing or not, 539 to mobile bearing or not and 409 to metal backing of the tibial component or not. Primary outcome measures are the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), SF-12, EQ-5D and need for further surgery.
At two years there was no evidence of differences in complications, clinical outcome, functional status or quality of life measures between randomised groups.
95% of the patient are now 5 year post-operation and have been sent questionnaires. 93% of these have been returned. By January 2008, all will be past 5 years and will have been sent questionnaires. When the complete 5 year data set is available it will be analysed. The 5 year data relating to the randomised groups will be presented.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr T Wilton, c/o BOA, BASK at the Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.
