Abstract
Introduction: The Birmingham Hip resurfacing was commercially introduced in 1997 and early originating centre series show good functional outcomes. Concerns have been raised over the longevity, functional outcomes and metal ion release from the implants. There are no series of medium term results from an independent district general hospital reported in the literature. We present a prospective series of 100 patients with mean 5 year follow up from a district general hospital. Each patient underwent yearly clinical, hip scoring, and regular radiographic evaluation.
Radiographic analysis was undertaken using Harris’, Hodgkinson’s and Amstutz’s criteria, evaluation of component position, neck narrowing and migration using diagnostic PACS workstations with standardised scaled images.
Results: Between June 2001 and Feb 2004 100 Birmingham Hip replacements were performed by two consultant surgeons (MP, AA). Mean follow up is 61.2 months (range 38–76 months). Harris hip scores (fig 1) improved from 46 pre-operatively to 90 post-operatively and no significant change over the next five years. There were no revisions in this period. Obese patients (BMI> 30) had a significantly (p< 0.03) lower post operative functional score as compared normal patients. No other factors were significant for outcome.
Component position was satisfactory in 93% of cases. Radiographic analysis showed no cups, or stems were definitely loose. Radiolucent lines were present in 8/100 acetabular and 3/100 femoral components, osteolytic lesions were seen in three acetabular components. Mean neck narrowing was 9mm. No patients show any radiographic evidence of avascular necrosis.
Conclusion This independent series shows the results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing are reproducible and comparable to those reported in the originating centre. The Birmingham hip resurfacing gives excellent clinical results, and there is no early evidence of radiographic failure. The high rate of neck narrowing gives us cause for concern and we would recommend regular radiographic follow up.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Peter Howard, Editorial Secretary, BHS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE, England.
