Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

THE ECONOMIC GAINS ACHIEVED BY A SIMPLE CHANGE IN POST OPERATIVE CASTING PROCEDURE



Abstract

Introduction: In June 2006, the post-operative plaster immobilisation protocol for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery at our institution changed from multiple plaster changes to the immediate application of a definitive reusable split synthetic cast. This study aims to assess the savings following this change in practice.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of plaster room records from June 2005 to June 2007 was performed.

The original procedure involved application of a plaster backslab following surgery, change of cast on day 1 post operatively, suture removal and plaster change at two weeks post-operation and cast removal or bivalving six weeks post-operation, following outpatient review.

The new procedure utilised a reusable cast applied in theatre which allowed suture removal and wound inspection in the community and outpatient review at six weeks without plaster change.

Results: Two hundred and twenty-two patients from 2005–6 were managed with the plaster procedure at a cost of £344.98 per patient and a total cost of £76,586.56. While 203 patients from 2006–7 were managed with the new procedure at a cost of £147.10 per patient and a total cost of £29,861.30. The net saving to the hospital of this change in practice was £197.88 per patient and £40,169.64 in total. There were no referrals back to the hospital as a consequence of this change in practice.

Discussion: Plaster changes and hospital outpatient appointments add cost to surgical procedures. This simple change in the post-operative casting of foot and ankle patients resulted in less outpatient visits and plaster changes without compromising the standard of medical care.

Conclusions: In the current political and financial climate it is important that economic efficiency, at a local level. This study demonstrates how small changes in local practice can result in significant financial savings for hospitals.

Correspondence should be addressed to: D. Singh, BOFAS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.