SOFT TISSUE EVALUATION IN A SHEEP MODEL COMPARING MINIMAL INVASIVE VERSUS OPEN PLATE OSTEOSYNTHESIS

Abstract

In recent years, plate osteosynthesis in metaphyseal and diaphyseal long bone fractures has been increasingly applied in a minimally invasive fashion. Several clinical studies describe a beneficial effect of the smaller additional soft tissue damage, resulting in satisfying fracture and soft tissue healing. However, is the surgical soft tissue damage really evidently smaller and the recovery faster?

A trauma model with severe, circumferential soft tissue damage to the distal right thigh and a distal multifragmentary (AO type C) femur fracture was carried out on 24 male sheep. After five days temporary external fixation, an internal fixator was placed either by a conventional open lateral approach or by minimally invasive technique. To assess the soft tissue damage and its recovery within the first 14 days, local compartment pressure monitoring as well as daily measurements of systemic markers (Creatin Kinase, CK and Lactate Dehydrogenase, LDH) in blood were performed. The local monitoring with a special probe (Neurovent PTO, Raumedic AG, Germany) within the quadriceps muscle allowed the measurement of compartment pressure (CP), as well as temperature.

The CK and LDH levels responded to the severe trauma with high peaks within the first 48 hours post trauma. After the internal fixator operations CK levels illustrate a significantly lower increase (p< 0.05) in the minimally invasive group compared to the open approach group in the first two days postoperatively. LDH levels show lower values for the minimally invasive group (p=0.06).

The values of CP present an initial increase after the trauma and then higher values (p=0.08) after the open plating operation. For the intracompartmental temperature no statistical differences were found, too (p=0.17).

These results, with reduced additional soft tissue damage and faster recovery in the minimally invasive approach group, reflect the clinical experience and expectations. However, while minimally invasive plate osteo-synthesis is certainly a desired option for fracture fixation, good surgical skills are required to insure that the reduced surgical trauma is in line with optimal fracture healing. The influence of the two different approaches on the bone healing per se, as well as the influence on soft tissue functionality, has yet to be demonstrated.