AN IN VITRO COMPARISON OF GENTAMICIN/CLINDAMYCIN-LOADED COPAL AND GENTAMICIN-LOADED PALACOS R-G BONE CEMENT: ANTIBIOTIC RELEASE, ANTIBACTERIAL EFFICACY AND BIOFILM FORMATION

Abstract

Copal bone cement loaded with gentamicin and clindamicin was developed recently as a response to the emerging occurrence of gentamicin-resistant strains in periprothetic infections. The objective of this study was to compare the in vitro antibiotic release and antimicrobial efficacy of gentamicin/clindamicin-loaded Copal bone cement and gentamicin-loaded Palacos R-G bone cement, as well as biofilm formation on these cements.

In order to determine antibiotic release, cement blocks were placed in phosphate buffer and aliquots were taken at designated times for measurement of antibiotic release. In addition, the bone cement discs were pressed on agar to study the effects of antibiotic release on bacterial growth. Biofilm formation on the different bone cements was also investigated after 1 and 7 days using plate counting and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Experiments were done with a gentamicin-sensitive S. aureus and a gentamicin-resistant CNS.

Antibiotic release after 672 h from Copal bone cement was more extensive (65% of the clindamycin and 41% of the gentamicin incorporated) than from Palacos R-G (4% of the gentamicin incorporated). The higher antibiotic release from Copal resulted in a stronger and more prolonged inhibition of bacterial growth on agar. Plate counting and CLSM of biofilms grown on the bone cements showed that antibiotic release reduced bacterial viability, most notably close to the cement surface. Moreover, the gentamicin-sensitive S. aureus formed gentamicin-resistant small colony variants on Palacos R-G, and therefore, Copal was much more effective in decreasing biofilm formation than Palacos R-G.

Biofilm formation on bone cement could be more effectively reduced by incorporation of a second antibiotic, next to gentamicin. Antibiotic release from the cements had a stronger effect on bacteria close to the cement than on bacteria at the outer surface of the bio-film. Clinically, bone cement with two antibiotics may be more effective than cement loaded with only gentamicin. The clinical efficacy of antibiotic loaded bone cements in combination with systemic antibiotics can be explained because antibiotics released from cements kill predominantly the bacteria in the bottom of the biofilm, whereas systemic antibiotics can only deal with bacteria at the outer surface of the biofilm.