Abstract
Introduction: Incorporation of Silicon into the HA structure enhances the bioactivity of Hydroxyapatite (HA). Silicon substituted calcium phosphate (SiCaP/SiHA) has been introduced as an osteoconductive material for bone formation. However, the osseoinductive capacity of this biomaterial has not been assessed. A previous study by Hing et al shows that bioactivity of stoichiometric hydroxyapatite bone substitute materials is enhanced by increasing the level of porosity within the implant struts [1].
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that SiCaP bone graft results in superior osseoinduction compared to stoichiometric HA and osseoinduction enhancement using high microporosity materials.
Methods: Implantation of 32 bone graft plugs (16 granular and 16 blocks) with 3 different strut porosities: 20% SiHA, 35% SiHA, 10% SiHA and 20% HA, all with matched 80% total porosity supplied by ApaTech Ltd into the paraspinalis muscle of 4 sheep for 12 weeks. HA and %SiHA locations were randomized at implant sites.
Following euthanasia at 12 weeks histomorphometry was carried out to calculate Percentage of bone, soft tissue and implant area and Percentage of the amount of bone in contact with the calcium phosphate surface (% Bone attachment). Further evaluation of Calcium, Phosphate and Silicon levels within the implants and surrounding bone was carried out by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and EDAX.
Results: Bone formation was observed within the pores of both granules and blocks of SiCaP and HA implants. Greater bone formation and attachment was detected in scaffolds with higher strut porosity (SiHA35) compared to implants of the same chemical composition but lower strut porosity (SiHA10, SiHA20. More bone formation and contact was observed in SiHA implants (SiHA20) compared to matched porosity HA implants where the amount of bone formed was minimal. Uniform distribution of Silicon (Si) was visible within the SiHA scaffold struts according to EDAX results. Greater quantities of Si existed in newly formed bone as compared to soft tissue adjacent to the SiHA implants. Silicon was not detected in either soft or hard tissues adjacent to HA implants.
Conclusion: Both microporous HA and SiCaP promote bone ingrowth, as ectopic bone formation was observed in all four groups of synthetic materials. Matched porosity SiCaP is more osseoinductive than HA. Increasing strut porosity results in promotion of osseoinductivity. High strut porosity (> 10%) block environment contributes to greater osseoinductive behaviour. In conclusion we report that presence of silicon and the strut porosity influence the osseoinductive capacity of calcium phosphate bone substitute biomaterials.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos A. Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Dept of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY
