Abstract
Introduction: Finite element (FE) simulation of damage accumulation in the femoral cement mantle is widely used to predict failure of hip prostheses. It is often assumed that the stem-cement interface remains bonded, although debonding is thought to affect cement stress and damage. Rough stems may reduce subsidence, but have been reported to have a detrimental effect on implant survival. Other factors thought to influence cement damage include stem design and orientation and cement thickness. This study investigates the effect of cement mantle thickness and stem malpositioning on cement damage around a smooth, collared implant, and the extent to which this is affected by debonding of the stem-cement interface.
Method: Three FE meshes were built to represent proximal femora with Stanmore Hip prostheses implanted into a thick (2.5 mm) and a thin (1.0 mm) cement mantle, and another thin (1.0 mm) mantle with the implant tilted in varus to achieve a minimal thickness of 0.1 mm laterally. Each model consisted of 4304 eight-noded brick elements with frictional contact at the stem-cement interface. Two analyses were run for each model, in which the stem-cement interface was (a) fully bonded, and (b) fully debonded, with Coulomb frictional contact using a friction coefficient of 0.5. Standardised femur geometry and elastic properties were used. Creep and non-linear damage accumulation in the cement mantle under cyclic loading was modelled using subroutines developed by Stolk et al. (2003). Boundary conditions were applied representing a peak stair-climbing load.
Results: Bonded cases showed extensive cracking around the tip in all cases. Debonded cases had 4–8 times less cracking, which was much more focused at the tip; only the poorly-centralised mantle showed extensive damage elsewhere, in the very thin lateral region. When bonded, the thick mantle had least cracks and the poorly-centralised mantle had most; in the debonded cases, there was no major difference between thick, thin, and poorly-centralised mantles. For each cement mantle geometry, peak maximum principal cement stress was consistently lower in the debonded case than in the bonded case.
Discussion: Our results show greater, more widely distributed cracking in bonded than debonded cement mantles, in contrast with previous studies involving collarless implants. For a collared stem, calcar contact prevents subsidence, allowing cement stress relaxation. A possible explanation for our result is that debonding enhances the stress relaxation process, reducing and redistributing interfacial and shear stresses; thus reducing damage rates. In contrast, a debonded collarless stem subsides continuously, sustaining high cement stress levels and damage rates. These results may explain the disappointing clinical performance of some rough-surfaced prostheses. Our results suggest that bonding might increase both cement damage and its sensitivity to cement thickness. Similar results for all debonded cement mantles indicate that cement thickness may be less critical than previously thought for smooth, collared prostheses. Bonding should not be assumed in FE studies of smooth stems which clinically are likely to debond; cement damage simulation should be extended to incorporate the debonding process.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos A. Wigderowitz, Senior Lecturer, University Dept of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY
