Abstract
Introduction: Kyphoplasty is a modification of the basic vertebroplasty technique used to treat osteoporotic vertebral fracture. This study evaluated whether kyphoplasty conferred any short-term mechanical advantage when compared with vertebroplasty.
Methods: Pairs of thoracolumbar “motion segments” were harvested from nine spines (42–84 yrs). Specimens were compressed to failure in moderate flexion to induce vertebral fracture. One of each pair underwent vertebroplasty, the other kyphoplasty. Specimens were then creep loaded at 1.0kN for 2 hours to allow consolidation. At each stage of the experiment, motion segment stiffness in bending and compression was determined, and the distribution of compressive “stress” was measured in flexed and extended postures by pulling a pressure- sensitive needle through the mid-sagittal diameter of the disc whilst under 1.5kN load. Stress profiles indicated the intradiscal pressure (IDP), stress peaks in the posterior annulus (SPP), and neural arch compressive load-bearing (FN).
Results: Vertebral fracture reduced bending and compressive stiffness by 37% and 55% respectively (p< 0.0001), and IDP by 55%–83%, depending upon posture (p< 0.001). SPP increased from 0.188 to 1.864 MPa in flexion, and from 1.139 to 3.079 MPa in extension (p< 0.05). FN increased from 13% to 37% of the applied load in flexion, and from 29% to 54% in extension (p< 0.001). Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty partially reversed these changes, and their immediate mechanical effects were mostly sustained after creep-loading. No differences were found between vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.
Conclusion: Kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are equally effective in reversing fracture-induced changes in motion segment mechanics. In the short-term, there is no mechanical advantage associated with kyphoplasty.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr J. O’Dowd, Honorary Secretary at SBPR c/o BOA, Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London, WC2A 3PE.
