ARTHROSCOPIC RELEASE OF FROZEN SHOULDER: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED STUDY COMPARING TWO TYPES OF REHABILITATION REGIME

Abstract

Aim: To compare 2 rehabilitation regimes after arthroscopic interval release: immediate mobilization versus immediate mobilization and external rotation night splint for ten days.

Methods: 30 patients aged 40–67 years with primary frozen shoulder were included in the study. The surgical procedure consisted of release of the coracohumeral ligament, rotator interval and the posterior capsule with electrocautery, followed by gentle manipulation. Patients were randomised into 2 rehabilitation groups: immediate mobilization (IM) or immediate mobilization with external rotation night splint (ERS) used for 10 days post-operatively. Patients were assessed pre & post operatively and using the visual analogue score for pain, Constant and Oxford scoring systems.

Results: There were 15 patients in the IM group and 15 in ERS group. In the IM group the Constant score improved from 35±10 (mean±SD) pre-operatively to 63±14 at 1 month and 75±11 at 6 months, and in the ERS group the Constant score improved from 33±9 pre-operatively to 59±14 at 1 month and 75±7 at 6 months. The Oxford score in the IM group improved from 35±9 pre-operatively to 25±8 at 1 month and 18±9 at 6 months, and in the ERS group from 38±9 pre-operatively to 27±8 at 1 month and 18±8 at 6 months (all changes P< 0.001 cf pre-operative, but NS from 1 to 6 months). Improvements in VAS were significant in both groups (P< 0.02) at 6 months but not at 1 month. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of Oxford or Constant scores or VAS at 1 and 6 months.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic interval release is successful in restoring range of motion in patients with idiopathic frozen shoulder. Both groups showed significant improvement during the study period with most improvement in terms of range of movement occurring in the first month. There was no significant difference in outcome between the two groups studied.