Abstract
Aim: To compare the rate of relapse of Ponseti treatment method with a historical cohort who underwent conventional surgery.
Method and Results: From June 2002 to December 2004, 70 patients presented with 107 clubfeet and started the Ponseti treatment method. 15 feet in 9 patients were excluded due to teratologic deformity. 50 patients with 75 clubfeet were studied (41 boys and 9 girls). There was at least a two-year follow up period, or failure of the Ponseti method within this time frame. Data was compiled from clinic assessment forms and patient notes. All cases resulting in recasting or further surgical procedures were regarded as failure of conservative treatment. This was compared to published data from the same centre, regarding relapse for the two-stage surgical method. From 1988 to 1995, 86 patients presented with 120 clubfeet and had surgical treatment. 68 patients with 91 clubfeet (48 boys 20 girls) had the two-stage surgical procedure and were followed up at a mean age of 5.7 years (2.2 to 9.6). The mean age for surgery was 8.9 months.
Relapse rate of both treatment methods was compared for all feet in all Dimeglio grades. Relapse rates for Ponseti and surgery respectively were: grade 2, 18.2% vs 0%; grade 3, 36.2% vs 20.4%; grade 4, 35.3% vs 65.4%. The differences were not statistically significant
Conclusions: The Ponseti method is as valid as the two-stage surgical method for the treatment of clubfoot. Functional outcomes of the two treatment methods need to be compared.
Correspondence should be addressed to: Mr J. B. Hunter, BSCOS, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
