CLINICAL OUTCOME AFTER THE ANATOMICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE LATERAL ANKLE LIGAMENTS AS DESCRIBED BY DUQUENNOY IN CHRONIC LATERAL ANKLE INSTABILITY: A LONG TERM FOLLOW-UP STUDY

Abstract

In the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), the non-augmented direct repair method as described by Duquennoy for treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability, is used since the early eighties. To our knowledge, this procedure has not been described in English literature before. We performed a retrospective study, to assess the long-term outcome of non-augmented anatomical direct repair procedures, as originally described by Duquennoy. The procedure reassures ankle stability by retightening and reinsertion of the original talofibular and calcaneofibular ligament, without dissecting the ligamental tissue. The purpose of this study is to determine the long-term effects of the procedure in terms of postoperative quality of life, joint function and development of osteoarthritis.

Twenty-three patients who were treated in our institution between 1985 and 2002 completed the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) for assessment of postoperative quality of life and the Olerud Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) for subjective symptom evaluation. Clinical reevaluation, including physical examination of the ankle and the completion of the Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scale (AOFAS) questionnaire, was conducted for twenty-one patients after a mean follow-up of 13±7 (range 3–22.2 years) years. At final follow-up radiographs were taken to assess the development of osteoarthritis. The mean total postoperative SF-36 and OMAS scores were 79.6 (SD ±14.6) points and 81.7 points (N= 23 patients) respectively. The mean total postoperative AOFAS score was 89.7 points (N= 21 patients). We found a significant postoperative reduction in talar tilt and anterior drawer sign. According to the AOFAS, the long-term functional outcome of the procedure was excellent in 10 patients (48%), good in 7 patients (33%), fair in 4 patients (19%) and poor in none of the treated patients. The results in terms of ankle function and stability do not seem to deteriorate in time. The procedure is seldom causing restriction in range of motion, neither a higher chance of degenerative changes in the ankle joint on the long term. We conclude that the procedure as originally described by Duquennoy is simple and effective, with a very low complication rate and does not provoke restriction in range of motion of the ankle joint.