COMPARISON OF NAVIGATED VS. CONVENTIONAL HIGH TIBIAL OSTEOTOMY – A CADAVER STUDY

Abstract

Introduction: The main purpose of this study was to analyze the accuracy of conventional versus navigated open wedge corrective osteotomies of the proximal tibia. Furthermore, the intraoperative radiation dosage and the time of the operative procedure of both groups were compared.

Methods: 20 legs of 11 fresh cadaver (9 male, 2 female, age 35–71 years) were randomly assigned to conventional open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) (n=10) or navigated open wedge HTO (n=10). Two legs had to be excluded because of pre-existing knee injuries. The aim of all corrective operations was to align the mechanical axis to pass through 80% of the tibial plateau (80% Fujisawa line), regardless of the preexisting alignment. The intraoperative mechanical axis was evaluated either by the cable technique for conventional HTO, or by a navigation module for navigated HTO (Medivision, Oberdorf/Switzerland). An angle fixed implant with interlocking screws (Tomofix, Mathys, Bettlach/Switzerland) was used to minimize postoperative loss of correction. Postoperatively, CT-scans were performed and the Fujisawaline and MPTA measured with a computer software for deformity analysis (Med-iCAD) The main outcome parameter was the accuracy of the correction, which was measured by the Fujisawa line. Secondary outcome parameters were the intraoperative radiation measured by the dose area product and the time of the operative procedure. For statistical analysis the standard deviation (S.D.) was calculated and the paired t-test applied.

Results: After conventional HTO, the mechanical axis was intersecting the Fujisawa line at 72.1% of the tibial plateau (range 60.4–82.4%, S.D. 7.2%). In contrast, after navigated HTO the tibia plateau was passed through 79.7% (range 75.5–85.8%, S.D. 3.3%). Thus, the accuracy of the correction was significantly higher after navigated HTO (p=0.020). In addition, the standard deviation of the corrections was significantly lower after navigated HTO (p=0.012). The medial proximal tibia angle (MPTA) increased 7.9° (range: 4.7–12.1°) after conventional HTO and 9.1° (range: 4.6–12.6°) after navigated HTO. The average dose area products of the conventional HTO (49.5 cGy/cm2, range 36.0–81.2 cGy/cm2) and navigated HTO (42.8 cGy/cm2, range 28.3–58.1 cGy/cm2) were comparable (p=0.231). However, navigated HTO elongated the operation time significantly (navigated HTO: 82 min, range 55–98 min; conventional HTO: 59 min, range 47–73 min) (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: Continuous three-dimensional imaging of the axis and of intraoperative tools with the a navigation module significantly improves the accuracy of open wedge osteotomies of the proximal tibia. Prospective clinical studies will show whether the results of this cadaver study can be transferred to the regular clinical use.