CHONDROGENIC POTENTIAL OF CHONDROCYTES OR FIBROBLAST INOCULATED UNDER PERIOSTEAL FLAP IN A RABBIT MODEL

Abstract

Introduction: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has been developed in order to repair cartilage successfully. Experimental models are based on osteochondral defects with potentially triphasic chondrogenic system: periosteal flaps, bone marrow cells and transplanted chondrogenic cells. All these three have chondrogenic activity so it is difficult to determinate the role of the implanted cells unless appropriate control is set up.

The purpose of this study is to determinate if the inoculation of chondrocytes under periosteal flaps does improve the chondrogenic potential of periosteal flaps.

MATERIALS AND Methods: 10 New Zealand rabbits, 8 months old were used. Right knees served as study group (ACI Group; N5: Chondrocytes + Periosteal Flap) – (Fibroblast Group: N5 Fibroblast + Periosteal Flap) and left knees as control group (N: 10: osteochondral defect alone). During the first procedure dermal fibroblast cells were isolated from skin biopsy and chondrocytes were isolated from the medial femoral condyle as a full thickness of the right and left knee were done. Chondrocytes and dermal fibroblasts cells were incubated for 4 weeks. Then they were implanted under periostel flap according to study group.

Chondrocyte and Fibroblast Implantation:

A parapatellar incision was performed on both knees. Defect was cleaned and on study group the periosteum taken from the tibia was sutured leaving one edge free to inoculate the chondrocytes or fibroblast according to group using a needle Then the defect was closed using fibrin glue. The animals were euthanatized 8 months postoperative.

Analysis: Specimens were evaluated using Hematoxylin and Eosin. Safranine and inmunohistochemistry for Collagen Type 2 using the ICRS score system.

Statistical Analysis: T student, Fisher and confidence interval were used. A p value < 0,05 was considered significant.

Results: Control non treated group presented a histological score grade mean IV (95% CI: 44–97)

The ACI group showed a tissue type means II (ICRS) (95% CI: 28–99%) Collagen type 2 was evident only in the deep layers. The fibroblast group did show a reparative tissue, tissue type mean II (95% CI: 28–99%) Collagen type 2 was evident in deep layers

DISCUSSION: According to this study the inoculation of chondrocytes under periosteal flaps does not improve significally the chondrogenic potential of periosteal flaps.(p: 0,77). Comparing the same procedure with chondrogenic and non chondrogenic cell lines could determinate the role of different chondrogenic components (periosteum and chondrocytes). Probably the chondrogenic capacity of the periosteum is sufficient to stimulate a reparative tissue. However none of these procedures could establish an adult normal cartilage hyaline tissue.