A NEW DOMED TIBIAL LATERAL COMPONENT PROVIDES IMPROVED RANGE OF MOVEMENT & RETAINS NORMAL KINEMATICS FOR THE OXFORD UKR

Abstract

Introduction: The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) use in the lateral compartment has been associated with a reduced flexion range and increased medial compartment pain than seen with its medial counterpart due to, in part, the inadequacy of a flat tibial tray replacing the domed anatomy of the lateral tibia. A new design incorporating a domed tibial component and a biconcave meniscal bearing has been developed to overcome these problems.

This study reports a clinical comparison of new and old establishing whether this modified implant has maintained the established normal kinematic profile of the Oxford UKR.

Method: Patients undergoing lateral UKR for OA were recruited for the study. Fifty one patients who underwent UKR with the domed design were compared to 60 patients who had lateral UKR with a flat inferior bearing surface. Kinematic evaluation was performed on 3 equal subgroups (n = 20); Group 1-Normal volunteer knees, Group 2-Flat Oxford Lateral UKR’s and Group 3-Domed Oxford Lateral UKR’s. The sagittal plane kinematics of each knee was assessed using videofluoroscopic analysis whilst performing a step up and deep knee bend activity. The fluoroscopic images were recorded digitally, corrected for distortion using a global correction method and analysed using specially developed software to identify the anatomical landmarks needed to determine the Patella Tendon Angle (PTA) (the angle the patella tendon and the tibial axis).

Knee kinematics were assessed by analysing the movement of the femur relative to the tibia using the PTA.

Results: PTA/KFA values, for both devices, from extension to flexion did not show any significant difference in PTA values in comparison to the normals as measured by a 3-way ANOVA. The Domed implant achieved higher maximal active flexion during the lunge exercise than those with a flat implant. Only 33% of the flat UKR’s achieved KFA of 130° or more under load whilst performing a lunge, compared with 75% of domed UKR’s and 90% of normal knees. No flat UKR achieved a KFA of 140° or more, yet 50% of all domed UKR’s did, as did 60% of all normal knees.

Conclusions: There was no significant difference in sagittal plane kinematics of the domed and flat Oxford UKR’s. Both designs had favorable kinematic profiles closely resembling that of the normal knee, suggesting normal function of the cruciate mechanism. The domed knees had a greater range of motion under load compared to the flats, approaching levels seen with the normal knee, suggesting that limited flexion for the flat plateau results from over tightening in high flexion and that this is corrected with the domed plateau. Problems with the second generation of lateral Oxford UKA have been rectified by a new bi-concave bearing without losing bearing stability and normal kinematics.