IN-VITRO MEASUREMENT OF PATELLAR MOVEMENT AFTER RECONSTRUCTION OF THE MEDIAL PATELLOFEMORAL LIGAMENT VERSUS MEDIALIZATION OF THE EXTENSOR MECHANISM

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The techniques to stabilize the patella can be divided into two groups: the first group seeks to change the direction of the extensor mechanism in order to medialize the extending force vector of the quadriceps muscle, e.g. by a distal medialization of the tibial tuberosity or a proximal realignment; the second seeks to reconstruct the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). The goal of this study was therefore to measure changes in patellofemoral kinematics in the intact, MPFL deficient knee, after medial transfer of the tibial tuberosity, after proximal realignment as well as after reconstruction of the MPFL.

METHODS: Eight fresh frozen right knee specimens were mounted in a knee simulator in which isokinetic flexion-extension motions were simulated. Extension cycles were simulated from 120° flexion to full knee extension with an extension moment of 31 Nm. Movement of the patella relative to the femur was measured using an ultrasound based 3D motion analysis system (Zebris, Isny, Germany). During the first test cycles, patellar movement under intact knee conditions were measured, while a constant 100 N laterally oriented force was applied by means of a steel cable attached to the patella. Subsequently, patellar movement was again measured after: transecting the MPL (deficient knee), performing a medialization of the tibial tuberosity, after reconstruction of the transected MPL using a semitendinosus autograft and after proximal realignment.

RESULTS: The patella of the intact knee moved along a medial path with a maximum attained position of 8.8 mm at 25° of knee flexion. The patella of the deficient knee moved up to 4.6 mm (p=0.04) in the medial direction at maximal extension at 30° of knee flexion. After medial transfer of the tibial tuberosity patellar movement reached a maximum medial position of 12.8 mm (p=0.04) at 22° of knee flexion with the laterally oriented force. With a reconstructed MPL, the patella attained a maximum medial position 14.8 mm (p=0.04) at 24.0° of knee flexion. Following proximal realignment, the patella moved on a medial, but significant (p=0.03) different path up to 13.8 mm medially at 30° of knee flexion. In addition, following medialization of the tibial tuberosity and proximal realignment, the center of the patella was significantly (p=0.03) more internally rotated (tilted) than the physiologic patella.

DISCUSSION: The shape of the movement curves after the stabilizating procedures resulted in a medialization relative to intact and deficient conditions. With the reconstructed medial patellofemoral ligament, the patella moved along the most medially oriented path with physiologic tilting. The results suggest that a semi-tendinous autograft can provide sufficient stabilization to prevent lateral displacement or subluxation with physiologic patellar tilt.