Abstract
Introduction: The use of simultaneous bilateral knee replacement surgery remains controversial–several studies have reported increased rates of complications, and the use of the technique remains in question. However, many of these procedures are not truly simultaneous, meaning it is difficult to draw accurate conclusions on the safety of this technique from the published literature.
Method: A retrospective notes based review of all those patients undergoing bilateral knee replacement surgery between 2000 and 2005 at Harrogate District Hospital was performed. Patients undergoing both unicompartmental (UNI) and total knee replacement (TKR) were included. Procedures were performed by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon and his knee fellow with one scrub team. The post operative morbidity and mortality was assessed both 30 days post operatively and also at six month follow up.
Results: A total of 112 procedures were performed over the five year period. There were no deaths reported within the study group. Within the group there were 3 DVT’s, 2 superficial wound infections and one case of aseptic loosening at six months. Average tourniquet time was 76 minutes for the TKR group and 82 minutes for the UNI group. Average length of stay over the five year period was 8.6 nights (TKR) and 6.6 nights (UNI).
Conclusion: Bilateral truly simultaneous knee replacement surgery is a safe technique with favourable rates of complications. It offers the benefit of improved efficiency with regard to both theatre time and length of hospital stay, which is valuable in the modern climate of economic strain within health services worldwide. It also offers an excellent opportunity to the trainee to operate independently within a controlled environment, and is favoured by patients–offering a single admission and rehabilitation period.
Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland
