INFLUENCE OF DESIGN AND MATERIAL ON THE MECHANICAL STRENGTH OF BONE ANCHORS FOR ARTHROSCOPIC ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR

Abstract

Aim: Retears after rotator cuff surgery occur frequently and may compromise the functional results. Failure of bone anchors and sutures may influence the results to a great part. The goals of this in vitro investigation were to determine the mechanical strength and stiffness of different bone anchors frequently used in arthroscopic rotator cuff surgery. Focus was put a material and design of the anchors.

Material und Methods: Four bone anchors were tested, each standing for a specific group of bone anchor. The metallic Super Revo screw 5.0 (Linvatec), the absorbable screw Spiralok 5.0 (Mitek), the absorbable press-fit anchor Bioknotless RC (Mitek) and the absorbable Ultra-sorb RC (Linvatec). The anchors were tested on 12 pairs of fresh-frozen human shoulders. The mean age at the time of death was fifty-seven years (range 27–93 yrs.).

Cyclic loading was performed, as it was considered the best way to simulate the postoperative conditions. The maximum tensile strength, the failure mode, and the displacement of the fixation device (system displacement) under load at the first cycle of 75 N and at the maximum tensile strength were recorded.

Results: As reported before the most frequent failure mode for the titan anchor Super Revo 5 mm was a rupture of the threads at the eyelet.

The absorbable Spiralok 5 mm screw anchor showed the highest failure load with a mean of 223 N. The failure loads of the remaining anchors were similar and ranged from a mean of 169 N for the Super Revo 5 mm, over a mean of 173 N for the Ultrasorb RC anchor to a mean of 188 N for the Bioknotless anchor. Among these anchors the differences were not significant. Only the Spiralok 5 mm screw showed a significantly higher failure load when compared with the Super Revo 5 mm screw.

The displacement of the various systems showed significant differences. The displacement of the Bioknotless anchor showed after the cycle with a tensile strength of 75 N a mean displacement of 13.8 mm, which was significant when compared with the remaining anchors.

Discussion: Our study shows that there is no advantage in using titan anchors with regards to primary stability in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. We could even detect a significantly higher failure load for the absorbable Spiralok 5 mm screw anchor compared to the Super Revo 5 mm titan screw. Stability and system displacement depend not only on the anchor material but on the design of the anchor. We found that the absorbable Bioknotless RC anchor showed a significantly higher system displacement during the first cyclic loading (75 N) while all other anchors tested had a similar system displacement.