Abstract
INTRODUCTION The ability to evaluate the alignment of total knee arthroplasty using postoperative radiographs might be confounded by limb rotation. The aim of the presented study was therefore to measure the effect of limb rotation on postoperative radiographic assessment and to introduce a mathematical correction to calculate the true axial alignment in cases of a confounded radiograph.
METHODS A synthetic lower left extremity (Sawbones®, Inc,Vashon Island, WA) was used to create a total knee arthroplasty of the Interax I.S.A.® knee prosthesis system (Stryker, Limerick, Ireland). Laser guided measurement of the tibia showed a femoral valgus angle of 6.5° postoperatively. The model was fixed in an upright stand which positioned the limb in varying degrees of rotation. Four series of 10 antero-posterior (AP) radiographs were taken with the knee in full extension, with femoral limb rotation ranging from 20° external rotation to 20° internal rotation in respect to the x-ray beam, in 5° increments. After digitizing each radiograph, four observer independently measured the femoral valgus angle for each series of the long leg radiographs using a digital measurement software (MEDICAD®, Hectec, Altfraunhofen, Germany). Each observer was instructed to determine the femoral valgus angle following the software’s guidelines. In addition each observer measured the geometrical distances of the femoral component figured on the radiographic film. Using a student t-test, the effect of femoral limb rotation on the measured femoral valgus angle and a correlation between femoral rotation and femoral valgus angle was established. Then for each limb rotation the distances ratio was determined to calculate the limb rotation.
RESULTS Without an application of femoral rotation the femoral valgus angle was measured radiographically to be 6.5° (SD 0.4°). With external femoral rotation the measured femoral valgus angle linearly decreased to a minimum of 4.5° (SD 0.2°) at 20° femoral rotation. The linear regression (R2=0.94) calculated a 0.09° change of radiographically measured femoral valgus angle per femoral rotation angle. With the femoral rotation the radiographically measured ratio decreased linearly (R2=0.98) with further internal rotation.
DISCUSSION The results of the presented study suggest a significant influence of femoral rotation during radiographic evaluation of limb alignment after total knee arthroplasty. With further external femoral rotation the radiographically apparent femoral valgus angle decreases. As the apparent femoral valgus angle changes linearly, a calculation of the distances of the particular femoral component could be used to determine the real femoral valgus angle in cases of femoral limb rotation.
Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland