HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION AFTER HIP SURFACE REPLACEMENT ARTHROPLASTY: A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY

Abstract

Introduction: Heterotopic ossification (HO) occurs commonly after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Its severe form can result in impaired range of motion with reduced functional outcome. The rate and severity of HO after hip surface replacement arthroplasty (SRA) have never been well studied.

Methods: Two hundred and ten hips (194 patients) were randomized to receive uncemented metal-on-metal THA (103) or metal-on-metal SRA (107). Standard antero-posterior radiographs of the pelvis were assessed for HO by 2 reviewers at the latest follow-up (minimum of 6 months), using Brooker severity grading and Kjaersgaard-Andersen regional classification.

Results: Pre-operative and post-operative data were similar for both groups. The incidence of HO was 38.5% in the SRA group compared to 32.6% in the THA group (p=0.5). However, there was a significant difference in severity grades for the 2 groups (chi square, p=0.02). According to Brooker_s classification, nearly half of HO was of grade 2 in SRA and of grade 1 in THA. SRA was associated with significantly higher rates of severe HO (grades 3 and 4) than THA (12.5% vs. 2.2%; p=0.009). Inter-rater agreement for Brooker grading was excellent (Cohen_s kappa, 0.88; p< 0.01). HO in SRA involved both the central and lateral regions in 26% of cases, whereas only 3% of HO in THA showed such a pattern (p=0.025). Risk factors, such as male gender, osteoarthritis, bilateral predilection, and previous history of HO, were observed in both groups. Patients with HO had reduced internal hip rotation (16.4° vs. 22.2°; p=0.02) and a higher incidence of postoperative hip pain (52% vs. 30%; p=0.04), but comparable functional outcome scores.

Discussion: The incidence of HO after hip arthroplasty seems to be determined by patient-related factors. However, HO severity appears to be associated with local surgical factors and thereby SRA may result in more severe HO than THA. An extensive surgical approach, additional soft tissue release and the blunt damage occurring in gluteal muscles with SRA may signal the induction of more severe HO. Peri-operative deposition of bone debris derived from femoral head preparation may also play a role by transplanting osteoprogenitor cells. Surgeons must be aware of this risk of severe HO when offering SRA as an alternative treatment to younger patients. Routine prophylaxis with NSAIDs needs to be considered in these patients. A meticulous surgical technique to reduce muscle damage, pulsed lavage to clear bone debris, and debridement of necrotic tissue, may help to decrease the risk of severe HO in SRA.