THE EFFECT OF THE TIMING OF TOURNIQUET RELEASE ON PERIOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS IN SIMULTANEOUS BILATERAL CEMENTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY

Abstract

Introduction: Besides other techniques to reduce blood loss, the use of pneumatic tourniquet is commonly accepted in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Furthermore it is used to maintain a clean and dry operative field to improve visualization, to use a better cementing technique, and to reduce operating time. The time of tourniquet release is discussed controversially in literature. However, there are only a few prospective randomised studies that compared the effect of timing of tourniquet release in cementless or cemented TKA. To our knowledge, this is the first study that investigated the influence of tourniquet release on blood loss in a randomized prospective study in simultaneous bilateral cemented TKA.

Methods: 20 patients (40 knees) underwent simultaneous bilateral cemented TKA with the cemented Triathlon Knee System (Stryker) between February and May 2006. The mean age of the patients was 67 years (67+/−11 years). 7 males and 13 females were treated with TKA (mean tourniquet pressure: 282.5+/−33.5 mm Hg). In 20 patients one knee was operated with tourniquet release and hemostasis before wound closure (“Technique A”), and the other knee with tourniquet release after wound closure and pressure dressing (“Technique B”). To determine the order of tourniquet release technique in simultaneous bilateral TKA, the patients were randomized in two groups: “Group A” (20 knees) first knee with tourniquet release and hemostasis before wound closure, and “Group B” (20 knees) second knee with tourniquet release and hemostasis before wound closure. The patients were given low molecular weight heparin and a leg dressing to prevent deep vein thrombosis. The blood loss was monitored two days after surgery till removal of the wound drains.

Results: We found no significant difference in total blood loss between “Technique A” (753+/−390 ml) and “Technique B” (760+/−343 ml) (p=.930). Furthermore there was no significant difference in total blood loss between both techniques after randomizing in “Group A” (“Technique A” 653+/−398 ml; “Technique B” 686+/−267 ml; p=.751) and “Group B” (“Technique A” 854+/−374 ml; “Technique B” 834+/−406 ml; p=.861). However, the operating time showed a significant difference between “Technique A” (58+/−18 minutes) and “Technique B” (51+/−17 minutes) (p=.035).

Discussion: In this study we compared the effect of timing of tourniquet release on perioperative blood loss in a randomized prospective study in simultaneous bilateral cemented TKA. Our results showed no significant difference of blood loss but a significant difference of operation time. Therefore, we recommend a tourniquet release after wound closure to reduce operating time and to minimize the risk of peri- and postoperative complications at approximately similarly blood loss between both techniques.