Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

POST-MORTEM HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF HA-COATED HIP STEMS: BONE ONGROWTH AND HA RESORPTION.



Abstract

Introduction: Investigating the correlations between bone ongrowth and HA resorption on coated implants is important to understand the contribution of resorbable coatings on implant fixation and periprosthetic bone remodelling. It is only possible histomorphometrically and this study measured bone apposition and residual HA on hip stems of one single design.

Methods: Post-mortem retrievals of 13 ABG-I (Stryker) hip stems from 13 patients (10f, 3m, age: 58–86yrs, uneventful THA, death unrelated to hip diseases). The time from implantation (stem in-vivo) ranged between 3.3 to 11.2yrs.

Three cross sections were cut from the metaphyseal femur and surrounding bone proximal to Gruen zones 2 and 6 (regions with HA coating). The three sections were A (proximal), B (mid-part) and C (distal). Sections were prepared using the Donath technique and then paragon stained for quantitative histomorphometry using an Axioskop microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) with image analysing (SAMBA, France).

For each segment the total implant perimeter, percentage of implant perimeter covered by bone and the total percentage of residual HA coating were measured. Bone implant contact was defined as direct ongrowth of bone to the coating or the titanium surface.

Results: HA resorption increased significantly with the time in-vivo as measured by the residual HA (e.g. < 6yrs: Avg.=36.7%, > 6yrs: Avg.=10.1%, p=0.02). This correlation was true for all sections A, B and C (p=0.02–0.03). Beyond 8yrs HA was almost gone.

Bone ongrowth ranged between 18%–56% and was independent of the time in-vivo. Bone ongrowth was most strongly correlated to patient age with younger patients having significantly higher bone ongrowth (p=0.001). Bone ongrowth was correlated with HA-resorption only in the most proximal zone A (p=0.001) with lower ongrowth associated with lower levels of residual HA. However, HA resorption was not significantly correlated with patient age.

HA resorption was significantly higher most proximally with less residual HA (13.0%) than mid-stem (22.6%, p=0.05) and distal (28.1%, p=0.05). Metaphyseal stem level and bone ongrowth were not significantly correlated in this manner.

Discussion: HA resorption increased with implantation time and was nearly completed at 8yrs. As bone ongrowth was independent of time in-vivo and independent of HA resorption on the mid-part and distal coated stem sections there is evidence that long term implant fixation is not diminished while the HA coating is being resorbed.

Bone ongrowth but not HA resorption was strongly correlated to patient age indicating that the bone remodelling process is more affected by individual bone health than it can be stimulated by HA coating.

HA resorption increased significantly from the distal to mid-stem and the most proximal coating level in the same way as stress shielding and thus osteoclastic stimulation goes up.

Correspondence should be addressed to Ms Larissa Welti, Scientific Secretary, EFORT Central Office, Technoparkstrasse 1, CH-8005 Zürich, Switzerland