Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

HOW ACCURATE ARE LOCKABLE ORTHOTIC KNEE BRACES AND WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS OF INACCURACIES? – AN OBJECTIVE GAIT ANALYSIS STUDY



Abstract

Introduction: There has been an increasing use of orthotic knee braces in the management of knee injuries. To ensure the biomechanics of the knee are not adversely affected, it is important that orthotic knee braces accurately provide the desired angle of immobilisation. The objective of our study was to measure the actual knee flexion angles for a lockable orthotic knee brace, and measure the resulting knee flexion moment.

Materials and methods: Eight healthy male volunteers participated in the study looking at six different types of knee immobilisation: locked in 0, 10, 20, 30 degrees of knee flexion, with the brace unlocked, and without a brace. Force and 3-dimensional motion data were collected using a single Kistler force plate and an eight-camera Qualisys ProReflex motion analysis system.

Results: The kinematic knee flexion angles were significantly different when compared with the angles set at the orthotic knee brace for 0 degrees (p=0.001) and 10 degrees (p=0.011). The kinematic knee flexion angle when no brace was used was significantly different from the angle for the unlocked orthotic knee brace (p= 0.003). The knee flexion moment was directly proportional to the knee flexion angle. There was a statistically significant difference between the knee flexion moment for the six types of immobilisation (p< 0.001).

Discussion: The knee flexion angles measured using the kinematic data did not always correspond with the angle set at the orthotic knee brace. These findings highlight inadequacies in the design of lockable orthotic knee braces, especially at low flexion angles of 0 and 10 degrees. The resulting higher actual knee flexion angles were associated with greater knee flexion moments and joint reaction forces at the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints. This can, at best result in increased energy expenditure and decreased agility, and at worse potentially augment injuries to the knee.

Correspondence should be addressed to: Tim Wilton, BASK, c/o BOA, The Royal College of Surgeons, 35–43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.