BILATERAL SIMULTANEOUS UNICOMPARTMENTAL REPLACEMENT

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the perioperative complications associated with bilateral simultaneous UKR and compare them with those of unilateral UKR and bilateral TKRs. Over a 2 year period, 40 patients underwent bilateral simultaneous Preservation unicompartmental knee replacement UKR. They were compared to 40 matched unilateral UKRs and 28 bilateral simultaneous total knee replacement patients who had their operations during the same time period by the senior author. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of age, weight, ASA grade and throm-boprophylaxis received. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rates of all 3 groups. When compared to 2 unilateral UKRs, bilateral simultaneous UKR results in a reduced operative time, blood loss and hospital stay but more blood transfusion. When compared to bilateral TKRs, bilateral simultaneous UKR results in reduced blood loss, reduced blood transfusion and hospital stay but an increased operative time. Bilateral UKR is a useful option in selected patients with bilateral unicompartmental osteoarthritis.