RESULTS OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY – A TRAUMA SURGEON EXPERIENCE

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma surgeons are often less exposed to large caseloads of primary osteoarthritis, compared to purely “elective”orthopaedic surgeons. The experience in total knee arthroplasty is thereby markedly On the other hand, posttraumatic knee arthrosis is often accompanied by severe deformity and axis deviation. In theory, navigated arthroplasty can overcome some of the problems in this setting.

Aim: Evaluation of the navigated technique of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), including the technical difficulties, the learning curve and the feasibility in severe bony deformity. Setting is a level I trauma center. Study setup was prospective, follow up period on average 14.5 months (11–25 months).

Patients: Between 7/04–6/05 we treated 36 patients with arthritis of the knee related to trauma. 18 patients were male. Average age at TKA was 59 (32–77) years. On average patients had 2.83 previous operations.

Methods: The navigational system used is manufactured by PRAXIM (La Tronche/France). It uses infrared-tracking and bone-morphing software. The implant was a mobile bearing LCS knee (DePuy/USA). Follow up included radiographs, clinical examination and the knee society scores.

Results: In three cases the procedure was finished in a conventional technique, reasons were suspicion of the surgeon about the cuts recommended by the system, a missing femoral cut block and a broken screw of the tracker-fixation. There was no failure of the navigational system. There was a clear learning curve regarding procedure time. Preop mean extension deficit was improved from av. 7.1° (0–30°) to 1.67° (0°–10°) postop., flexion contracture improved from av. 95° to 103°. The combined knee society score (max. 200 pts) improved from 77 pts preop to 156 pts at follow up.

Conclusions: Navigated knee endoprosthesis is reliable tool for the trauma surgeon with few technical problems. Especially for surgeons with less experience in TKA, planning of implant size and position is very helpful. With posttraumatic deformity the surgeon can gain valuable information and assistance to improve alignment and ligamentous balancing.