COMPUTER NAVIGATED TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT IN OBESE PATIENTS

Abstract

Obesity [Body Mass Index (BMI) > 30kg/m2] is seen in a growing percentage of patients seeking joint replacement surgery. Operations in obese patients take longer and present certain technical difficulties. Computer navigation improves consistency of prosthetic component alignment but increases operation time.

Our aims were

1. to compare tourniquet times of non-obese with obese patients having knee replacement using standard instruments or computer navigation and

2. to evaluate the change in tourniquet time as the surgeon gained experience over a three year period.

A retrospective analysis of 232 total knee replacement (TKR) operations performed by a single knee surgeon over a three year period was carried out. Similar knee prostheses (Plus Orthopedics, UK) were used in all cases. Variables to be assessed were the operative technique (computer navigation assisted or standard instruments) and BMI of patients.

Of the 232 knees, 117 were performed using computer navigation and 115 with standard instruments. Each of the groups was subdivided as per BMI to differentiate obese patients (BMI > 30) from the non-obese. Tourniquet times of surgery were used for comparison amongst the subgroups.

There were 56 and 59 patients in the non-obese and obese subgroups respectively within the standard TKR group. The average tourniquet times for these were 79.3 and 86.3 minutes respectively. This was a significant difference (p=0.037). Correspondingly in the computer navigated group, there were 60 non-obese and 57 obese patients. Their tourniquet times were 105.4 and 100.5 minutes respectively. This difference was not significant (p=0.15)

The obese patients in each group were then studied separately and divided into three equally sized subgroups in chronological order. Each sub-group comprised 19 standard TKRs and 19 computer navigated TKRs. Tourniquet times of operations were compared within each sub-group. P values within the first subgroup showed a significant difference. There was no significant difference within the second and third subgroups.

We concluded that obesity significantly increased the operative time in the standard TKR group. However in computer navigated TKR there was no significant difference in operative time between non-obese and obese patients. As the surgeon acquired experience of computer navigation there was no difference in time taken for conventional and computer navigated TKR in obese patients. We hypothesize that in obese patients, computer assisted navigation helps the surgeon to overcome jig alignment uncertainty without any time penalty.