Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

EVALUATION OF ACETABULAR CUP POSITION AFTER THE COMPUTER-ASSISTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY



Abstract

Since the autumn of 2003, a computer-assisted system (VectorVision® Hip, version 2.1, Brain LAB, Germany) has been used to perform total hip arthroplasty (THA) operations in our hospital. In the present study, the postoperative acetabular cup position was evaluated using the records of the system and the data measured from postoperative radiographs.

To date, 18 patients have been treated using this-system. We studied the cup inclination and anteversion records in this system recorded in the THA procedures. We also measured the cup inclination and anteversion using postoperative radiographs, according to the method described by Pradhan. The inclination and ante-version were the ‘operative’angles for this system and were the ‘radio graphical’ ones for measuring from the radiographs according to the definition described by Murray.

The initial planning of the acetabular cup position was 45° ‘operative’ inclination and 20° ‘operative’ ante-version. From the system records, the average ‘operative’ inclination was 46.5°± 3.9° and the average ‘operative’ anteversion was 25.5°± 6.0°. The average ‘radio graphical’ inclination measured from the postoperative radiographs was 49.0°± 6.0°, and the average ‘radio graphical’ anteversion was 10.6°± 5.8°.

Between the ‘operative’ angles from this system and the ‘radio graphical’ angles from the postoperative radiographs, the inclination was approximately the same, while the anteversion was different. When the ‘radio graphical’ anteversion was corrected for X-ray beam spreading and then converted to the ‘operative’ anteversion, the resulting ‘operative’ anteversion was 21.1°± 7.8°. And when the ‘operative’ anteversion recorded by this system was corrected for the pelvic tilt, the corrected ‘operative’ anteversion was 22.1°± 6.5°. The average difference between these corrected ‘operative’ anteversion in each case was 5.8°± 3.8°. Especially in 10 of the 18 cases, each difference was within 5°. The accuracy of the cup position using this computer-assisted system was shown by this study.

Correspondence should be addressed to Richard Komistek, PhD, International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty, PO Box 6564, Auburn, CA 95604, USA. E-mail: ista@pacbell.net