Abstract
Purpose: To examine whether neutral or valgus placement results in greater fracture strength ex vivo, when the femoral neck is notched superolaterally as sometimes occurs during hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
Methods: We loaded 10 paired fresh-frozen notched proximal cadaveric femora (8F/2M, 66 to 80 years) to failure. In each case, the right femur was implanted, using bone cement, with a machined resurfacing component aligned neutrally with respect to the femoral neck whereas the left femur was implanted at 10° valgus. The superolateral notch was 3 mm wide by 2 mm deep directly beside the component. Potted femurs were loaded to failure using an Instron materials testing machine. All 20 femora were scanned using Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Results: The effect of neutral versus valgus placement was complex. (1) Two pairs slowly crushed; the remaining femurs exhibited a clear fracture. When only the fracture-type failures were analyzed, valgus placement resulted in fracture loads on average 22% higher than for neutral placement (paired t-test, p< 0.05). All femurs failed within the notch, as occurs clinically. (2) Femurs with high bone density (BMD> 0.65 g/cm2) showed a significant increase in fracture load (p< 0.05) whereas femurs with low BMD (< 0.65 g/cm2) were unaffected by component placement. BMD was highly correlated with fracture load (Pearson r=0.87, p=0.0003). (3) The greatest improvements occurred when the neck-shaft angle was relatively low, 128°–132°. (4) Two of ten femurs required larger head sizes at 10° valgus.
Conclusions: (1) Fracture load was primarily controlled by bone quality (BMD); (2) nevertheless, varus/valgus placement did affect the fracture load; (3) the magnitude and direction of this effect depended on fracture type, bone mineral density and the original neck-shaft angle; (4) for the level of bone quality typical of patients undergoing hip resurfacing, and for low-to-average neck-shaft angles (up to 132°), the fracture load for 10° valgus placement was significantly higher than for neutral placement. Funding: Other Education Grant
Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada
