Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ONCOLOGIC AND FUNCTIONAL RESULTS FOLLOWING UNCEMENTED PROXIMAL TIBIAL ENDOPROSTHETIC REPLACEMENT FOR TUMOR.



Abstract

Forty-six patients with an uncemented proximal tibial endoprosthesis were reviewed following resection of a proximal tibial tumor. The mean age was thirty-four years and the majority were male. The most common malignant diagnosis was osteosarcoma. Oncologic and functional analysis was performed on these cases. At latest follow-up thirty of the patients remain alive with no evidence of disease and eleven had died. The most common complication was deep infection (7/46). Only six patients had mechanical prosthesis related complications. At latest follow up the average TESS score was 76.3 and MSTS score 75.5 with an average extensor lag of 6.5o.

To review the oncologic and functional results of a series of forty-six uncemented proximal tibia tumour replacements.

A retrospective review of our prospectively collected database revealed forty-six patients with an uncemented proximal tibial replacement following tumour excision. The data was analysed with respect to patient demographics, operative and prosthetic complications. Oncologic diagnosis and results and functional results were also reviewed.

The average age of the forty-six patients was thirty-four years (14–73) with thirty-three males and thirteen females. The most common diagnosis was osteosarcoma. There were four cases of benign GCT. At an average follow-up of 85.8 months (11–170), thirty were alive with no evidence of disease while eleven patients had died of their disease. Four patients were alive with evidence of disease at latest follow-up and one patient had died of unrelated causes.

The most common operative complication was infection (9/46) with seven of these being deep infections requiring prosthesis removal, followed by mechanical problems including stem fracture (3/46) and bushing failure (3/46) also requiring operative intervention.

Functional assessment revealed an average extensor lag of 6.5o with an average ROM of 83.6o, average TESS scores of 76.3 and MSTS 93 scores of 75.5.

Large series of uncemented proximal tibial endoprostheses are uncommon in the literature. In our series there is a low rate of aseptic loosening at an average seven year follow-up, but this is offset by problems including infection and prosthetic fracture. Overall the functional and oncologic results remain satisfactory.

Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada