Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TWO TO FOUR YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A COMPARISON OF HOME VS. PHYSIOTHERAPY-SUPERVISED REHABILITATION PROGRAMS FOLLOWING ACL RECONSTRUCTION



Abstract

The original RCT demonstrated that a limitedly-supervised post-ACL reconstruction rehabilitation program was both clinically more effective and less costly than the traditional physiotherapy-supervised program. This study contacted patients from the original RCT a minimum of two years post-surgery to evaluate whether or not the clinical findings of the RCT were upheld over the long term. This study of eighty-eight patients has upheld the original findings in that the patients who performed the limitedly-supervised (home-based) program had a significantly higher mean disease-specific quality of life score compared to the patients who performed the physiotherapy-supervised rehabilitation program.

To determine whether or not there were any differences in long-term outcome between those patients who performed a physiotherapy-supervised rehabilitation program (PT) and those who performed a primarily home-based rehabilitation program (H) in the first three months following ACL reconstruction.

Patients were originally randomized, before ACL reconstruction surgery, to either the physiotherapy-supervised (seventeen physiotherapy sessions) or home-based program (four physiotherapy sessions). Eighty-eight of the original patients were able to return two to four years following surgery to assess their long-term clinical outcomes. Primary outcome: the Mohtadi ACL disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (ACL QOL). Secondary outcomes: bilateral difference in knee extension and flexion range of motion, sagittal plane knee laxity, relative quadriceps and hamstrings strength, and IKDC score. Unpaired t-tests were used to compare the two groups across the continuous variables. A Chi square test was used for the categorical data.

The home-based group had a significantly higher (p = 0.02, 95% CI [18.4, 1.7]) mean ACL QOL score (80.0 ± 16.2) compared to the physiotherapy-supervised group (69.9 ± 22.0) a mean of forty months post-surgery. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to any of the secondary outcome measures.

This long-term study upholds the short-term findings of the original RCT in that the home-based rehabilitation program is more effective than a more physiotherapy-intensive program for patients in the first three months following ACL reconstruction.

Given the resource savings demonstrated in the original RCT, the home-based program is clearly economically-dominant (i.e., clinically more effective and less expensive).

FUNDING: Calgary Health Region

Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada