Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

KINEMATIC COMPARISON OF TWO ANKLE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTIVE TECHNIQUES



Abstract

Testing of cadaver ankle specimens was conducted to investigate the changes in kinematics with lateral ligament reconstructions. Testing included an intact condition, after injury at the ATFL and CFL sites, and separately a Brostrom repair and an anatomical gracil-lis graft reconstruction. Calcaneal range of motion was determined about the axis of applied moment in plantarflexion-dorsiflexion and in inversion-eversion directions. The injury and reconstructions were most sensitive during IE applied moment. Both reconstructions appeared to behave similar to intact motion. Failure of some Brostrom repairs however, suggest that the gracillis-graft reconstruction is initially a stronger repair.

Limited research has biomechanically investigated lateral ankle ligament reconstruction procedures. The objective of this study was to determine the changes in ankle kinematics with a dual ligament Brostrom repair and an anatomical gracillis graft reconstruction.

Seven cadaveric ankle specimens were tested independently in an intact condition, after an ATFL/CFL injury model, and two reconstructions. The anatomical graft reconstruction wove a gracillis tendon through the calcaneus and fibula to dually reconstruct the ATFL and CFL, and anchored to the talus. Moments were applied to the calcaneus for three cycles in plantarflexion-dorsiflexion (PD) and inversion-eversion (IE) while allowing unconstrained motion. Three dimensional motions of the calcaneus and tibia were optoelectronically tracked. Range of motion (ROM) was calculated about the axis of applied moment for the calcaneus with respect to the tibia.

The ROM increase from the intact condition with the injury model was only significant for IE (p=0.001). No significant differences were found between intact and any treatments in the PD configuration. In IE, both the graft reconstruction and the Brostrom repair were significantly different from the injury model (p=0.002 and p=0.015 respectively), where the gracillis reconstruction appears more similar to the intact condition. For two specimens the Brostrom repaired ATFL failed during applied inversion moment.

The injury and reconstructions were most sensitive during IE applied moment. Both reconstructions appeared to behave similar to the intact condition. Failure of some Brostrom repairs however, suggest that the gracillis-graft reconstruction is initially a stronger repair.

Funding: Workers Compensation Board of British Columbia

Correspondence should be addressed to Cynthia Vezina, Communications Manager, COA, 4150-360 Ste. Catherine St. West, Westmount, QC H3Z 2Y5, Canada