A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY AND HEMIARTHROPLASTY IN MOBILE INDEPENDENT PATIENTS WITH DISPLACED INTRACAPSULAR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURE

Abstract

Arthroplasty is the most effective management of displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture. Hemiarthroplasty (HEMI) is associated with acetabular erosion and loosening in mobile patients and total hip arthroplasty (THA) with instability.

We sought to establish whether HEMI or THA gave better results in independent mobile patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture.

Eighty-two patients were randomised into two groups. One arm received a modular HEMI, the second a THA using the same femoral stem. Patients were followed for a mean of three years after surgery.

After HEMI, eight patients died, two were revised to THA and there is intention to revise three. One patient had a periprosthetic fracture. Mean walking distance was 1.08 miles and Oxford Hip Score (OHS) 22.5. Twenty patients (64.5% of survivors) had radiological evidence of acetabular erosion.

After THA, four patients died, three dislocated, one required revision. Mean walking distance was 2.23 miles and OHS was 18.8.

HEMI is associated with a higher rate of revision than THA and potential revision because of acetabular erosion. THA after three years displayed superior walking distances (p=0.039) and lower OHS (p=0.033).

THA is a preferable option to HEMI in independent mobile elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fracture.