Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

DESIGN AND APPLICATION OF A DYNAMIC EXTERNAL LENGTHENER THAT DRASTICALLY REDUCES SOFT TISSUE COMPLICATIONS DURING LARGER EXTENT TIBIAL LENGTHENING



Abstract

Introduction: Although distraction osteogenesis techniques have been used clinically for the treatment of many skeletal conditions with great success over the last 2 decades, one-step larger extent tibial lengthening (> 5 cm) still remains a clinical challenge. In which tension unbalance of bone and soft-tissue may occur, and complications such as foot drop, ankle and knee dysfunction, cartilage injure and secondary osteoarthritis were common. We have designed and manufactured a new lengthener, which allows bone and soft tissue to be lengthened in synchronism, and ankle joint remain in functional position and may move freely during lengthening.

Methods: A dynamic cross joint apparatus at ankle level was added to a classic Ilizarov circular four-ring lengthener, the apparatus is consisted of a half ring, two dynamic junctions and an elastic (spring) device. In application pins were inserted into distant and proximal segment of the tibia, also through calcanues, the external fixator with the trans-joint device was then applied. Total 296 patients (age 6–46, average 21), 466 legs, were treated with this new lengthener, among them were 55 cases of infantile paralysis, 38 cases of post-trauma bone defects, 33 cases with congenital dysplasia and 170 cases of chordrodysplasia, rickets, dwarf and short stature (height < 148cm). Unilateral tibia lengthening was performed in 126 legs and bilateral tibia lengthening was performed in 340 legs.

Results: Average lengthening for lower limb discrepancy cases was 6.8 cm (2–8cm), and 8.8 cm (8–18cm) for dwarf and short stature. Patients can stand straight and walk during the lengthening. Average movement of ankle joint remained at 10 degree in all cases and x-ray confirmed that average ankle joint space was 2.2 mm (1–4mm). There was no foot drop and ankle joint deformity seen, and in 98% cases ankle joint function fully recovered within 1.5 years after lengthening (6–8 months). Common complications were pinhole infection (25 cases) and broken pin (8 cases). If total lengthening was over 10cm, 70% cases developed slight ankle joint stiffness that would gradually recover after physiotherapy. Severe complications occurred in 5 cases (1%), including nonunion 1 case, mal-union 1 case, bone deformity 1 case and re-fracture 2 cases. All of those cases were cured with satisfactory clinical outcome.

Discussion: The challenge of larger range tibial lengthening is mainly the soft tissue complications, such as foot drop, varus and valgus deformity of ankle joint and loss of ankle function. Prolonged soft tissue traction around the ankle joint may lead to increasing cartilage compression, cartilage damage and partial or permanent loss of joint function. Our dynamic lengthener would allow synchronized lengthening of triceps, Achilles tendon and prosterior tibia muscle with tibia, maintain ankle joint space and free ankle movement. This device was simple and easy to apply, with no need of additional Achilles tendon lengthening. Our clinical study has demonstrated that this device drastically reduced the rate of soft tissue complication. This device makes larger extent tibial lengthening (> 5cm) safer and realistic in clinical practice.

Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary BORS, University Dept of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.

None of the authors have received anything of value from a commercial or other party related directly or indirectly to the subject of the presentation