Abstract
Introduction: Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is a tyrosine kinase membrane-spanning protein whose function is to regulate chondrocyte proliferation, differentiation and matrix production during cartilage development. Several mutations in FGFR3 have now been documented to link to human diseases. A number of these mutations result in constitutive activation of the FGFR3, leading to proliferation and premature differentiation of chondrocytes. Depending on the mutation and the resultant level of FGFR3 activation, mild to severe skeletal dysplasias such as achondroplasia (ACH), hypochondroplasia (HCH), thanatophoric dysplasia type I (TDI) and type II (TDII), and severe achondroplasia with developmental delay and acanthosis nigrans (SADDAN) may result. It has been postulated that the signalling pathways downstream of FGFR3 may be responsible for activating transcription factors, leading to up-regulation of cell cycle inhibitors and causing abnormal suppression of chondrocyte cell proliferation. However, the precise signalling pathways involved in FGFR3 mutation have as yet to be elucidated. The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the differences in the downstream signalling pathways between FGFR3 mutants.
Methods and Results: Wild type FGFR3 has been cloned into expression vector pcDNA3 and the construct has been used to generate four different FGFR3 mutants using site-directed mutagenesis. The mutations which have been introduced and the types of dysplasia they correspond to were as follows: K380R (ACH), N540K (HCH) and K650E (TDII). A kinase dead form of the receptor, K504R has also been generated. Wild type and each of the four mutant FGFR3 proteins in pcDNA3 vector have been successfully transfected into 293T cells using the calcium phosphate method. Immunoprecipitation and Western Blot analysis of cell lysates revealed expression of wild type protein in three isoforms of size 135kDa (mature), 120kDa (intermediate) and 98kDa (immature). The mutant proteins all followed a similar pattern of expression with the exception of the TDII mutant that did not express the mature form of the FGFR3. Changes in MAPK, PLCã and STAT 1 signalling pathways in response to FGFs-1, 2, 9 and 18 in the 293-cells of wild type and mutant forms of FGFR3 are now under investigation, in an attempt to define which pathways are mostly responsible for the resultant abnormal phenotypes.
Discussion: Genomics studies have demonstrated that FGFR3 expression is significantly upregulated during the osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) under BMP-2 stimulation in vitro. Subsequent functional studies have demonstrated that a selective ligand for FGFR3, FGF9, is able to induce tyrosine kinase signalling, and the osteoblastic differentiation of MSCs in vitro. Further understanding the signalling mechanisms of FGFR3 activation in normal and mutant forms may lead to discover potential anabolic agents that are based on FGFR3-FGFs pathways.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary BORS, University Dept of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.
One or more of the authors has received something of value from a commercial or other party related directly or indirectly to the subject of the presentation