Abstract
NSAIDs inhibit fracture repair, yet the mechanism behind this effect is unknown. It is recognised that NSAIDs impede tumour growth via an inhibition of angiogenesis, primarily via a COX-2 pathway. We propose that the inhibition of fracture repair is via a similar mechanism and have investigated this hypothesis using a murine fracture model. 225 animals were randomised into either treatment (rofecoxib) or control groups and underwent a standard open femoral fracture treated using an external fixator. Outcomes measures involved assessment of healing using radiographic, histolological and biomechanical means; and measurement of blood flow across the fracture gap using Laser Doppler Flowmetry. X-ray analysis showed a similar healing pattern in both groups, however at days 16 and 32 the NSAID group had significantly poorer healing. Histological analysis showed that controls healed quicker (significant at days 24 and 32); and had more bone but less cartilage at day 8. Biomechanical testing showed controls were statistically stronger and stiffer at day 32, while NSAID animals had a significantly greater rate of fixation failure, leading to loss of pin-bone osseointegration; this occurred primarily before day 16. There was no difference in blood flow between the groups on the day of surgery, and both groups exhibited a similar flow pattern; NSAID animals however, exhibited a lower median flow from day 4 onwards, which was significantly poorer at days 4, 16 and 24. Positive correlations were demonstrated between a higher blood flow and both the histological and radiographic results. While NSAIDs were seen to inhibit fracture repair in all outcome measures; and were also noted to decrease blood flow at the fracture, with strong negative correlations being noted between NSAID prescription and fracture repair; multiple regression analysis suggest that this negative effect of NSAIDs on healing is independent of its inhibitory action on blood flow. COX-2 inhibitors are marketed as having cleaner side effect profiles and prescribing is on the rise. Recently however some of the newer COX-2 specific inhibitors have been removed from the market as their seemingly clean side effect profile has come under scrutiny. We have demonstrated that the COX-2 specific inhibitor rofecoxib does has a significant negative effect on fracture repair; and as hypothesised that it also has a significant negative effect on blood flow at the fracture site. While these outcomes strongly correlate, the mechanism behind the effect remains to be elucidated, as we have also demonstrated that these modalities are independent of each other.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary BORS, University Dept of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.
None of the authors have received anything of value from a commercial or other party related directly or indirectly to the subject of the presentation