Abstract
Introduction: Tibial component loosening is a common mode of failure in modern total knee arthroplasty and is thus a common cause for revision knee surgery. Direct bone ingrowth of press fit knee prosthesis has been deemed an important prerequisite for long-lasting implant fixation and thus clinical success in both primary and revision TKA whether for cemented or uncemented stems. To achieve good long term biological stabilization, initial secure mechanical stability, (i.e. minimising tibial tray and stem motion with respect to the tibia,) is vital. A lack of initial stability can lead to resorption of bone at the implant-tissue interface and can consequently result in loosening and failure of the prosthesis. Obtaining adequate tibial fixation is difficult in revision patients as often there is insufficient bone stock in the proximal tibia. A longer stem is often recommended with revision surgery as a central stem should guide the migration of the tibial component so that it occurs predominantly along the vertical axis, thus minimising the risk of recurrent malalignment and loosening due to tilting of the tibial tray. It is also thought that the presence of a third rigid peg helps to reduce inducible displacements by anchoring the new implant in robust cancellous bone. However there is no consensus on the length of central stem should be to achieve the best load transfer and fixation and although the use of long stems on the tibial component is advocated, in revision TKA involving bone grafting and augmentation. The effect of the tibial stem length in other cases has received contradictory evaluations. This research deals with an experimentally evaluate the effect that central stem lengths on the initial micromotion of the tibial tray in two revision tibial defects. This is being investigated by measurement of the bone-implant interface motion of the tibial stem.
Method: Composite bones were resected with an extramedullary jig. Three common revision defects were compared 1) no defect requiring no repair(primary); 2) T1 defect requiring bone impaction grafting; 3) T2A requiring augmentation. Three stem configurations were analysed in conjunction with these defects 1) no stem; 2) short 40mm stem; 3) long 80mm stem. Four LVDTs were positioned anteriorly, posteriorly, medially and laterally around the tray and were used to measure the movement of the tibial tray with respect to the tibia. The bones were potted and subjected to axial loading simulating 1– 6 times body weight for 3500 cycles at 1 Hz.
Results: The longer stemmed press fit implants were associated with slightly higher levels of micromotion compared to the “no stem press fit” trays in the primary and T2A defects. This could be due to the fact that cutting errors are accentuated by a longer stem and can cause increased levels of posterior lift off. For bone impaction grafting it seems that a stem sufficiently long to by-pass the defect should be used. The proximal surface cemented trays presented more stable fixation with the inducible displacement between the no stem and stemmed groups being negligible. Subsidence of the tibial tray was reduced marginally by using a longer stem.
Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary of BORS, Division of Surgery & Oncology, Section of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School Tort Centre, Dundee, DD1 9SY.
