STRESS ANALYSIS OF THE ALL POLYETHYLENE TIBIAL TRAY

Abstract

All polyethylene tibial components (APT) for total knee joint replacement have been recently reintroduced due to their past success and cost savings with respect to knee designs with a metal backed tibial tray (MBT). However, isolated cases of collapse of the medial bone in APT designs have been observed by the authors prompting this investigation. The objective of this study was to investigate the stress/strain distribution within the cancellous bone for the APT and MBT systems, particularly looking at the effects of coverage of the tray over the proximal tibia in each design. A three-dimensional finite element model of the proximal tibia implanted with a tibia tray was generated. An elliptical cylindrical tibia tray with a peg was modeled as being perfectly bonded to a PMMA layer on the superior surface of the cancellous and cortical bone. Gap size between the edge of the tray and outer of the cancellous bone, was introduced in the medial direction. Load was applied on the superior surface of the tibial insert in the medial side. Two lift-off loading cases were used, a low load of 800N (1 body-weight) and a high load of 3200N (4 x BW), both on the medial side. Permanent plastic deformation and collapse was allowed only in the cancellous bone, while all other materials were modeled elastically. Under low load conditions within the elastic limit, introducing a gap between the tray and the cortical bone produced a stress/strain intensity in the cancellous bone beneath the edge of the tray. The strain in the cancellous bone within the APT design was generally 3 times greater than the MBT design, however, peak strain values were similar at the edge of the tray. Whilst the strain increased with the introduction of a gap the resulting strain was not sensitive to the gap size for both designs. Under high load conditions, permanent plastic deformation and bone collapse were observed in the cancellous bone at the edge of the tibial tray in both designs where a gap was introduced. The maximum strain in the cancellous bone was found to be more sensitive to the gap size for the APT design than the MBT design. This can be contributed to the difference in the load transfer through the cancellous bone in the two designs. The MBT design with the more rigid tibial tray transfered higher load through the outer cortical bone than the APT design. The less rigid APT design resulted in progressive collapse of the cancellous bone beneath the tray. Particularly significant was the volume of highly stressed cancellous bone which was 4 times greater in the APT design compared to the MBT design. The results suggest that coverage may be a more important parameter for the APT design than the MBT design. The APT design may, therefore, be more suited to patients with better bone quality.