header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

ACHILLES TENDON RUPTURE – MISINTERPRETATION AND RECORDING OF THE CALF SQUEEZE TEST AMONG ACCIDENT AND EMERGENCY AND ORTHOPAEDIC DOCTORS



Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis of Achilles tendon rupture must be made promptly and reliably to prevent avoidable morbidity. The calf squeeze test (CST) offers a simple clinical test with high sensitivity. However, in our clinical practice we have noticed a lack of clarity in the medical notes. We believe there is confusion regarding what constitutes a positive CST. Movement of the foot being positive or lack of movement of the foot indicating the test is positive. The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of error and to determine whether this is due to lack of knowledge, an inability to perform or correctly interpret and record the result of the CST. We assessed SHO’s , Registrars and Consultants in the Accident & Emergency and Orthopaedic Departments.

Method: Ninety one doctors completed a supervised questionaire. They were asked four questions 1) What tests they chose to diagnose Achilles tendon rupture. 2) How they would perform a CST. 3) What they considered a positive CST to mean . 4) How they would record the diagnosis of a ruptured Achilles tendon.

Results: 92%(84/91) of doctors overall chose to use a CST. 88%(80/91) performed the CST correctly. The CST was interpreted incorrectly by 41%(15/37) and 26%(14/54) of A + E and Orthopaedic doctors respectively. Also 32%(12/37) of A + E and 19%(10/54) of Orthopaedic department doctors mistakenly thought that the diagnosis of an Achilles tendon rupture was consistent with a negative test.

Conclusion: The results suggest that the recording of AT rupture may be inaccurate in as many as 32%(12/37) when patients present to the A + E department. This error is not a result of lack of knowledge or performance of the CST but of interpretation and recording. We would strongly discourage the recording of the CST in terms of a positive or negative result. The result should be described in words, for example ‘No movement of the foot on squeezing the calf muscle.’ We suggest that all SHOs and Registrars who may be called upon to assess patients with suspected Achilles tendon rupture are informed of this source of error.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary of BORS, Division of Surgery & Oncology, Section of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School Tort Centre, Dundee, DD1 9SY.