HISTOLOGICAL AND HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF 12 CAMBRIDGE ACETABULAR CUPS RETRIEVED AT AUTOPSY

Abstract

Introduction: The Cambridge Acetabular cup is a unique, uncemented prosthesis that has been designed to transmit load to the supporting bone using a flexible material, carbon fibre reinforced polybutyleneterephthalate (CFRPBT). This should significantly reduce bone loss and provide long term stability. The cup consists of a ultra high molecular weight polyethylene liner within a carbon fibre composite backing that was tested with either a plasma sprayed HA coating or with the coating removed. The cup is a horseshoe shaped insert of similar thickness to the cartilage layer and transmits force only to the regions of the acetabulum originally covered with cartilage. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of bone and surrounding tissues to the presence of the cup in retrieved human specimens.

Methods: We examined 12 cementless Cambridge acetabular implants that were retrieved at autopsy between 2 and 84 months following surgery. Nine of the implants were coated with HA and three were uncoated. The implant and the surrounding bone were fixed, dehydrated and embedded in polymethylmethacrylate. Sections were cut parallel to the opening of the cup and in two different planes diagonally through the cup. The sections were surface stained with toluidine blue and examined by light microscopy. Image analysis was used to measure the percentage of bone apposition to the implant, the area of bone and fibrous tissue around the implant and the thickness of hydroxyapatite coating.

Results: All 9 HA coated implants showed good bone contact with a mean bone apposition and standard deviation of 50.9% +/− 17.5%. The thickness of the HA coating decreased with time and where this was occurring bone remodelling was seen adjacent to the HA surface. However, even in specimens where the HA coating had been removed completely good bone apposition to the CFRPBT remained. Bone marrow was seen apposed to the implant surface where HA and bone had both been resorbed with little or no fibrous tissue. The uncoated implants showed significantly less bone apposition than the HA coated specimens, mean 11.4% +/− 9.9%(p < 0.01) and significant amounts of fibrous tissue at the interface.

Discussion: The results of this study indicate that the anatomic design of the Cambridge Cup with a flexible CFRPBT backing and HA coating encourages good bone apposition. In the absence of HA the results are generally poor with less bone apposition and often a fibrous membrane at the implant surface. There was a decrease in HA thickness with time in situ and cell mediated bone remodelling seems to be the most likely explanation of the HA loss. However, good bone apposition was seen to the CFRPBT surface even after complete HA resorption in contrast to the uncoated specimens. Though the mean bone apposition percentage to the HA coated implants declined with time, the bone was replaced by marrow apposed to the implant surface. This is in contrast to the uncoated implants where fibrous tissue becomes apposed to the implant surface. We believe this is due to micro-motion occurring at the bone implant interface. The HA coating appears necessary to provide good initial bone bonding to the implant surface that is maintained even after complete loss of HA.