header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

A UNILATERAL EXTERNALLY FIXED RAT FEMORAL FRACTURE MODEL



Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this research project was to establish a simple, reliable and repeatable externally fixed femoral fracture model. The rat was selected, as it was a suitable animal for use in a model of fracture repair and ovariectomy induced osteoporosis, both of which were to be investigated in future experiments. There are femoral fracture models described in the literature based on the insertion of an intramedullary nail prior to inducing a fracture. We felt, based on our experience of the unilateral externally fixed mouse fracture model, that external fixation would allow us to carry out radiographical and histological analysis of fracture healing without any of the tissue trauma caused by the insertion and removal of the intramedullary device.

Materials and Methods: A unilateral external fixator was chosen due to its simplicity. Four threaded stainless steel pins pass through holes in an aluminium plate with nuts placed on the pin above and below the plate. The holes in the plate were 0.1mm bigger than the pins and unthreaded allowing the plate to slide freely over the pins. Tightening of the upper nut compressed the plate against the lower nut holding the pin securely. 41 female Sprague-Dawley rats, aged between 12 and 18 weeks, were used. They were anaesthetised using a standard mixture of hypnorm and midazolam and analgesia, fluids and antibiotic were administered subcutaneously prior to surgery. The femur was exposed through a lateral approach and a standardised osteotomy was made prior to the application of the fixator plate. Accurate reduction was confirmed visually at the time of surgery and also by way of a post-op x-ray. 25 animals were sacrificed at 4 days and 1, 2, 4, 6 and 8 weeks for histology. The fractured limbs were harvested, fixed, decalcified and paraffin embedded as per standard protocol and serial sections were cut. These were stained with H& E and alcian blue and analysed 15 animals were sacrificed at 4,6 or 8 weeks for biomechanical strength testing. Four-point bending was carried out on freshly harvested femurs stored in normal saline between harvest and testing. Both limbs were tested and the fractured limbs were standardised relative to the unfractured limb. Maximum load to failure was recorded and stiffness was calculated from the load-displacement curve.

Results: No post-operative complications of fixation failure or infection occured. On histological assessment at D4 a predominantly lymphocytic inflammatory response was seen within the fracture haematoma. This inflammatory response was replaced with endosteal and periosteal new bone between wks 1 and 2. Bridging of the fracture gap was seen at week 6. Both stiffness and load to failure increased with increasing time. There was a statistically significant improvement in the percentage stiffness and percentage load to failure between 4 and 8 weeks (p=0.03 and p=0.018 respectively). The difference in load to failure between 6 and 8 weeks was also significantly different (p=0.042).

Discussion: A simple, reliable and repeatable externally fixed rat femoral fracture model has been established.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary of BORS, Division of Surgery & Oncology, Section of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School Tort Centre, Dundee, DD1 9SY.