header advert
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF 4 METHODS OF FIXATION USED FOR HAMSTRING ACL GRAFTS



Abstract

Aims: The aims of this study were to evaluate the biomechanical properties and mode of failure of 4 methods of fixation used for hamstring tendon ACL grafts. The fixation methods investigated included titanium round headed cannulated interference (RCI) screws, bioabsorbable RCI screws, Endobuttons and Bollard fixation. It has been previously shown that a 2 strand tailored equine tendon-Soffix graft has equivalent biomechanical properties to a 4 strand human hamstring tendon-Soffix graft [1,2], therefore this model was used for the graft in the study.

Materials and Method: 32 stifle joints were obtained from skeletally mature pigs, the soft tissues were removed and the ACL and PCL were sacrificed. Tibial tunnel preparation was standardised using the Mayday Rhino horn jig to accurately position a guide wire. An 8 mm cannulated reamer was then used over the guide wire to create the final tibial tunnel. A back radiusing device was then placed into the tibial tunnel to chamfer the posterior margin of the tunnel exit to prevent abrasion and fretting of the graft. A 2 strand equine tendon-Soffix graft was then introduced into the tibial tunnel and secured with one of the four fixation methods. The proximal part of the graft was attached to the cross head of the materials testing machine using the Soffix. Five of each method of fixation were tested mechanically to failure and three of each method were cyclically loaded for 1000 cycles between 5 to 150 N, followed by 2000 cycles at 50 to 450 N.

Results: The mean ultimate tensile loads (UTL) were: titanium RCI screw = 444 N, bioabsorbable RCI screw = 668 N, Endobutton = 999 N and Bollard = 1153 N. The mode of failure for all RCI screws involved tendon slippage past the screw. Two Endobutton failures were encountered and one Bollard pull out occurred. Under cyclic loading conditions the titanium and bioabsorbable RCI screws failed rapidly after several hundred 5 to 150 N cycles due to tendon graft damage and progressive slippage. Both the Bollards and Endobuttons survived 1500 cycles at 50 to 450 N, with less tendon slippage occurring.

Conclusion: Titanium and bioabsorbable RCI screws provide poor initial fixation of tendon grafts used for ACL reconstruction, having significantly lower UTL’s than both Endobutton and Bollard fixation. Under cyclic loading titanium and bioabsorbable RCI screws fail rapidly due to progressive tendon slippage, whereas Bollards and Endobuttons survive cyclic loading. Both Bollard fixation and Endobuttons provide sufficiently high UTL’s and survive cyclic loading to allow early postoperative mobilisation and rehabilitation. Caution must be used in the early postoperative period when using interference screws to secure a hamstring tendon graft because progressive tendon slippage may result in excessive graft elongation and early clinical failure.

Correspondence should be addressed to Dr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary of BORS, Division of Surgery & Oncology, Section of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School Tort Centre, Dundee, DD1 9SY.

References:

1 Goddard et al. Biomechanical properties of tailored equine extensor tendon. BORS, Leeds, April 2002. Google Scholar

2 Fules et al. Biomechanical properties of polyester Mk I and Mk II Soffix acting with Equine and Human tendons. J Bone Joint Surg: 83-B Supp 1, 2000. Google Scholar