Abstract
Introduction: One of the most common complications following total joint surgery is aseptic loosening. Improving the bone-cement interlock may increase implant longevity. An ideally prepared bony surface is dry; clean; free from marrow, fat and debris; free from active bleeding; and free from micro-organisms. Lavage removes debris, blood and fat from the interstices of the bone surface so as to allow optimal penetration of the cement. The hypothesis that we investigated in this study was that lavage with a detergent solution obtains a greater depth of cement penetration into bone compared with lavage using 0.9% saline, hydrogen peroxide or an alcohol solution.
Methods: The cancellous bone of ovine femoral condyles were cut into 10×10×13mm blocks. Lavage solutions were delivered via a pulsatile system and directed towards one side of the bone block. All blocks were swabbed dry. A high viscosity cement was manually mixed and applied to the sandblasted surface of titanium alloy plate (10×10mm, weight 0.9g ±0.01g). The titanium plate and cement were placed on the irrigated bone block, and a known weight applied to achieve pressurisation. Time, temperature and method were controlled. The prosthesis-cement-bone composite was sectioned perpendicularly, and image analysis used to quantify penetration depths. 10 readings were recorded per block with 6 blocks per lavage group.
Results: Cancellous bone porosity averaged 75.2% (±4.0) . The mean penetration depth in the saline group averaged 3.39mm (± 0.77); 3.04mm (± 0.59) using a 2% alcohol solution; 3.33mm (±0.79) using a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution; and 5.41mm (± 1.30) when using the detergent lavage. There was no significant difference in cement penetration depth between hydrogen peroxide and saline irrigation (p> 0.05), nor with hydrogen peroxide and alcohol irrigation (p> 0.05). Irrigation with saline however, afforded statistically superior cement penetration than that of alcohol lavage (p < 0.012). Irrigation with detergent solution demonstrated significantly greater depth of penetration than all three other lavage groups (saline p< 0.05; alcohol p< 0.05; hydrogen peroxide p< 0.05).
Discussion: Detergents can physically remove particulate matter and emulsify and remove fats, thereby acting to maximise porosity of the cancellous bone network and optimise space for occupation by intruding cement. This study has proven the ability of a detergent solution to provide a clean, debris free cancellous network, which consequently provides a significantly greater depth of cement penetration than other commonly used irrigating agents. It was noted that cement penetration into cancellous bone followed the line and depth of cleaning from lavage. In conclusion, the hypothesis can be accepted, and lavage with a detergent solution affords a statistically greater depth of cement penetration into bone than that of the universally used 0.9% saline lavage.
Correspondence should be addressed to Mr Carlos Wigderowitz, Honorary Secretary BORS, University Dept of Orthopaedic & Trauma Surgery, Ninewells Hospital & Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY.
