Abstract
Introduction: Proximal humeral fractures are common in the elderly osteoporotic population. Surgical management of such fractures with traditional internal fixation techniques is often challenging due to poor bone quality. Fixation with intramedullary devices theoretically offers better fixation, but with increased risk of shoulder pain and decreased range of motion. We undertook a study to compare outcome following fixation of such fractures with either an intramedullary nail (Polarus), standard Clover Leaf plate (AO), or Philos Locking plate (AO).
Method: All patients admitted for surgical management of a proximal humeral fracture were entered into the study. 10 patients were treated using a Philos plate (Group 1), 5 with a Clover Leaf plate (Group 2), and 10 with a Polarus nail (Group 3). Post-operative assessment included radiological evaluation, clinical assessment of range of motion compared to the non-injured arm, assessment of pain severity (visual analogue scale), and functional assessment (DASH score). Non-parametric statistical techniques were used to analyse results.
Results: There was no significant difference in age or sex distribution between the three groups. (Mean ages: Group 1: 54.6 yrs, Group 2: 45.2 yrs, Group 3: 59.7 yrs) Mean patient follow-up was 22 months (range 5–52 months).
All patients in Group 1 and 2 went on to satisfactory radiological and clinical union. A higher complication rate was noted in the Polarus nail group, with 3 patients requiring removal of metal due to soft tissue or subacromial impingement. In addition one patient developed a non-union and required Philos plate fixation.
All groups demonstrated a significant decrease in shoulder range of motion following injury, however this was less marked in Group 1 (Philos plate). In addition, patients in group 1 (Philos plate) demonstrated a more rapid recovery in terms of severity of pain, functional impairment and range of motion in the early postoperative phase. However, no significant long-term difference was noted in terms of post-operative pain or functional deficit between group 1 and 2. The poor outcome in group 3 was associated with a high incidence of shoulder pain and secondary procedures.
Conclusion: Intramedullary fixation of proximal humeral fractures resulted in a high level of complications requiring secondary procedures in many cases. Our study supports the safety and efficacy of plate fixation techniques in the operative management of proximal humeral fractures.
The abstracts were prepared by Emer Agnew, Secretary to the IOA. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Irish Orthopaedic Association Secretariat, c/o Cappagh National Orthopaedic Hospital, Finglas, Dublin 11, Ireland.
