Abstract
Purpose Of The Study: This study measures the changes in the lumbar spine in different postures, pre- and after insertion of the device.
Material-Method-Results: All the 25 patients, with chronic back pain, had discography preoperatively a positional MRI scans pre-op and nine months postoperatively in different postures.
The patients were divided into two groups. The Group-A with 14 patients in which only Dynesys was used and Group-B with 11 patients in which Dynesys was combined with fused levels.
The operated levels were 51, 13 of which were fused. The results showed that the mean range of movement of the lumbosacral angle reduced by 10.28° (Preop=39.21°, Postop=28.93°) (p=0.016) in group-A. In group-B it reduced by 13.73° (Preop=36.18°, Postop=22.45°) (p=0.02).
The range of movement of the end plate angle at the instrumented segments in group-A reduced by 2.96° (Preop=5.56°, Postop=2.60°) (p=0.016) while in group-Bit reduced by 4.23° (Preop=6.69°, Postop=2.46°)(p=0.008).
The mean range of movement of the end plate angle at adjacent level in group-A reduced by 1.58° (Preop=8.7°, Postop=7.21°)(p=0.427) while in group-B it increased by 1.73° (Preop=6.91°, Postop=8.64°) (p=0.149)
The mean anterior disc height in group-A reduced by 1.18mm (Preop=10.05mm, Postop=8.87mm) (p< 0.005), and the posterior one was increased by 0.6mm (Preop=6.51mm, Postop=8.87mm) (p=0.013). In group-B, the anterior disc height was reduced by 1.11mm (Preop= 10.44mm, Postop=9.33mm) (p=0.049) and the posterior one by 0.16mm (Preop=6.98mm Postop=6.82mm) (p=0.714)
Conclusion: Dynesys stabilizing system allows movement at the instrumented levels, with no significant increased mobility in the adjacent levels. Also the device acted to compress the more the anterior annulus than to distract the posterior.
Honorary Secretary Mr Bimal Singh. Correspondence should be addressed to BOSA (British Orthopaedic Specialists Association), c/o Royal College of Surgeons, 35 – 43 Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London WC2A 3PE.
