COMPARISON OF PROPRIOCEPTION AND RANGE OF MOTION AFTER THE LOW CONTACT STRESS ANTEROPOSTERIOR GLIDE (LCS AP GLIDE) AND ROTATING PLATFORM (LCS RP) KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: A RANDOMISED DOUBLE BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate and compare the effects of two types of LCS total knee arthroplasty AP glide {(posterior cruciate is retained and the mobile bearing allows anteroposterior and well as rotational movement) and RP (in which posterior cruciate is sacrificed and the mobile bearing allows only rotational movement)} on joint proprioception and range of motion.

Methods: 30 patients scheduled to undergo mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty were randomised to receive either a LCS AP glide or Rotating platform prosthesis. Clinical scores (Oxford knee score, American knee society score (AKSS), EuroQol), range of motion and proprioception were assessed prior to and at three and six months after the operation. Proprioception was assessed in terms of absolute error angle (mean difference between the target angle and the response angle). Student’s t-test was used to compare the mean of two groups (with a level of significance of p < 0.05).

Results: Both groups were comparable in terms of pre-operative range of motion, oxford knee score, American knee society score, EuroQol score and proprioception. At 6 months there was significant improvement in the Oxford knee score, AKSS and EuroQol score in both groups (p< 0.001), but no difference was noted between the two groups with respect to these parameters. There was improvement in the proprioception (reduction in absolute error angle) in both groups though this was not significant statistically (p> 0.05). The mean active non-weight-bearing range of motion improved in both groups {AP glide group, (p< 0.05) and RP group, (p> 0.05)}

Conclusions: We did not find significant difference between AP glide and RP LCS knee arthroplasty in terms of improvement in proprioception and range of motion.