Abstract
Background: To determine whether the operation of LSD destabilizes the lumbar spine and leads to an increase in any pre-existing scoliosis or spondylolisthesis. Lumbar spondylosis, which commonly includes a degenerative listhesis and a scoliosis, is the commonest cause for stenosis in the lumbar spine. The standard operation for spinal stenosis remains a laminectomy with fixation and fusion in the presence of possible instability. The laminectomy, however, destabilises the spine and the instrumented fusion makes it a much bigger operation in patients often not best placed to cope with it. The more limited operation of LSD, which has previously been reported to this society, avoids a simultaneous fusion or instrumentation and has been shown to give long term symptomatic relief (1) Its possible effect on the stability of the spine has not previously been reviewed.
Methods: A retrospective clinical and radiological review of consecutive patients operated on for degenerative spinal canal stenosis with either a pre-existing scoliosis or degenerative listhesis or both. Sixty-one patients (44 female and 17 male) with a mean age at operation of 72.8ys (range: 54–85). Pre-operatively 35patients (57%) had a degenerative listhesis, 14 patients (23%) a lumbar scoliosis and 12 (20%) had both. The mean postoperative follow-up was three years (range from one to fourteen years).
Results: None of the 47 patients with a preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis had any change in grade of the listhesis. Also no patient developed a new spondylolisthesis.
Of the 26 patients with a preoperative scoliosis, 10 progressed by a mean of 4.9° (range 2°–15°)
Conclusion: The results show that the operation of LSD was not associated with the development of a spondylolisthesis or a further progression of a pre-existing listhesis, and no patient developed a scoliosis. In those who had a scoliosis pre-operatively, 38% progressed and this only to a degree which we believe falls within the natural progression to be expected in such a group of patients. We believe these results support the view that the operation of Limited Segmental Decompression for spinal stenosis does not significantly destabilize the spine, even in a group that would appear most vulnerable, and as such there is no indication in such cases to consider a simultaneous instrumentation and fusion.
The abstracts were prepared by Mr Colin E. Bruce. Correspondence should be addressed to Colin E. Bruce, Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon, Alder Hey Children’s Hospital, Eaton Road, Liverpool, L12 2AP.
References:
1 CR Weatherley et al. (2004). Segmental Spinal Decompression, a Midline Preserving Operation for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis – Operative Technique and Results. J Bone and Joint Surg [Br]; 86 (Suppl 2): 114. Google Scholar
