Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

TREATMENT OF DEVELOPMENTAL DISLOCATION OF THE HIP AFTER WALKING AGE.

7th Congress of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lisbon - 4-7 June, 2005



Abstract

Introduction: Cases of developmental dislocation of the hip occur after walking age because of late or missed diagnosis and failed conservative or operative treatment. Up to now there is no consensus on the treatment of DDH after walking age. The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the results of operative treatment in DDH after walking age in our patient population and to describe the treatment strategies and operative techniques used.

Material and Methods: Forty-two patients presenting 54 cases of DDH after walking age were operated on in our clinic between 1985 and 1997. There were 34 female and 8 male patients, with an average age at the time of operation of 47 months (range: 14 – 151 months). The parameters studied were the type of DDH according to Ts, the preoperative AC- angle, the postoperative AC- and CE- angles as well as the radiological outcome using the Severin classification.

Results: Based on the Ts classification we found 18 cases of type II, 22 cases of type III and 14 cases of type IV dislocations. Each hip had an average of 1.4 operations. The average preoperative AC- angle was 38.2 degrees (range: 22–50) whereas the average AC- angle in the last radiographic follow up was 22.2 degrees (range:5–10). The statistical analysis showed that the AC angle at the last follow up was significantly (p< 0,001) smaller than in the preoperative radiographs. The classification according to Severin showed class I in 28 cases, class II in 15 cases, class III in 8 cases and class V in 3 cases.

Conclusion: Although our study presents the results after a mid-term follow up the radiological results favor our clinical experience that a single stage combined procedure consisting of open reduction, pelvic osteotomy as well as a corrective osteotomy within the proximal femur with subsequent shortening should be recommended.

Theses abstracts were prepared by Professor Roger Lemaire. Correspondence should be addressed to EFORT Central Office, Freihofstrasse 22, CH-8700 Küsnacht, Switzerland.