Abstract
Historically spine surgeons have been powerless to help most patients with painful vertebral insufficiency fractures. Treatment was supportive, hoping that fractures could heal in situ, and accepting the resulting kyphosis and its consequences. Surgery was the court of last resort in instances of disabling neurologic deficits. The very same deficient skeleton that lead to the clinical issue, was simultaneously the principal limiting factor in surgical undertakings. Complications could be common and substantial.
Vertebroplasty was born out necessity in the treatment of ‘inoperable’ vertebral metastases. The technique has become a widely adopted method of managing refractory painful vertebral insufficiency fractures, especially those due to osteoporosis. In skilled hands, vertebroplasty provides a high degree of pain relief and patient satisfaction. The fracture is fixed in situ as the marrow space is embolised with PMMA. Kyphoplasty is a technical evolution that enables active fracture reduction before fixation with PMMA. Much is made about the potential differences between the two treatment methods, but no direct comparative studies are available to allow objective conclusions. In any event, as medical therapies improve the treatment of osteoporosis in general, surgeons now have the opportunity to intervene when painful vertebral fractures are a primary source of functional impairment and life quality.
The abstracts were prepared by Professor Bruce McPhee. Correspondence should be addressed to him at Orthopaedics Division, The University of Queensland, Clinical Sciences Building, Royal Brisbane & Women’s Hospital, Herston, Qld, Australia
