Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Orthopaedic Proceedings Logo

Receive monthly Table of Contents alerts from Orthopaedic Proceedings

Comprehensive article alerts can be set up and managed through your account settings

View my account settings

Visit Orthopaedic Proceedings at:

Loading...

Loading...

Full Access

FUNCTION FOLLOWING RESECTION OF HUMERAL METASTASES – ANALYSIS OF 59 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS



Abstract

Introduction: Metastatic bone disease of the humerus may be associated with disabling pain and loss of function. Surgery must provide good local tumor control, immediate mechanical stability, and a short rehabilitation period. Between 1980 and 2000, the authors operated 59 patients with metastatic disease of the humerus. The current study summarizes the principles of the surgical technique and functional and oncological outcomes.

Materials and Methods: There were 33 females and 26 males. Indications for surgery included pathological fracture (40), impending fracture (11), and intractable pain (6). Anatomic locations of humeral metastases included: around the proximal humeral metaphysic and head (Type I) – 18, humeral diaphysis (Type II) – 39, and humeral condyles (Type III) – 2. Types I and III metastases were treated with resection and endoprosthetic reconstruction. Type II metastases were treated with intralesional tumor removal and cemented nailing. Postoperatively, 31 patients were treated with radiation therapy, 35 with chemotherapy, and 14 with immunotherapy.

Follow-up of the study patients included physical examination, radiological evaluation and functional evaluation according to the American Musculoskeletal Tumor Society system.

Results: Patients who had cemented nailing had better overall function, emotional acceptance, hand positioning, and lifting ability than patients who underwent endoprosthetic reconstruction. Pain alleviation and dexterity were comparable in both groups. All patients had a stable extremity and overall function of 56 patients (95%) was > 68% of normal upper extremity function. Only two patients (3%) had a local tumor recurrence.

Conclusions: An aggressive surgical approach in patients who have humeral metastases and meet the criteria for surgical intervention is beneficial; it provides durable reconstruction and is associated with good function and local tumor control in most patients.

The abstracts were prepared by Ms Orah Naor. Correspondence should be addressed to Israel Orthopaedic Association at PO Box 7845, Haifa 31074, Israel.