DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY ANALYSIS OF FEMORAL REMODELLING OF UNCEMENTED PROSTHESES: COMPARISON OF THREE DIFFERENT STEM DESIGNS

Abstract

Introduction and Aims: This study evaluated the proximal femoral remodelling associated with three uncemented femoral prostheses of different designs and surface treatments. We hypothesised that less bone loss will occur over time with a titanium implant designed for proximal stress transfer compared to a more rigid stem that produces diaphyseal loading.

Method: During total hip arthroplasty (THA), patients were implanted with either: AML cobalt-chrome alloy porous-coated stem (11 patients), Osteonics titanium alloy hydroxyapatite-coated stem (13 patients), or Sulzer titanium alloy hydroxyapatite-coated stem (eight patients). All patients followed the same surgical and post-surgical protocol for THA. Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans of the operated proximal femur were performed on all patients pre-operatively, three to seven days post-operatively, and then six weeks, six months, and annually up to five years post-operatively. Longitudinal changes in bone mineral density (BMD) were compared within and between the two groups.

Results: Using the first post-op DEXA scan as baseline, the percent change in BMD (g/cm²) at one year was −17.06% in patients implanted with the AML stem. The percent change in BMD at one year was −3.06% in the Osteonics group and in the Sulzer group, the percent change in BMD at one year was −4.11%. The greater bone loss observed with the AML stem was found to be statistically different than the bone loss observed with the other two stems. These findings continued at three and five years post-operatively.

Conclusion: There was a trend toward less bone atrophy and preservation of bone stock in patients implanted with both the HA and Sulzer stems. Extensively coated, diaphyseal-fitting, CoCr stems (AML) definitely caused greater bone loss, both proximally and in the diaphysis.